Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Bias in peer review
Carole J. Lee, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Guo Zhang, et al.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2012) Vol. 64, Iss. 1, pp. 2-17
Closed Access | Times Cited: 843

Showing 26-50 of 843 citing articles:

The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science
Hugo Horta, Jisun Jung
Higher Education Quarterly (2024) Vol. 78, Iss. 4
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence
Balázs Aczél, Ann‐Sophie Barwich, Amanda B. Diekman, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2025) Vol. 122, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewers
Saman Ebadi, Hassan Nejadghanbar, Ahmed Rawdhan Salman, et al.
Journal of Academic Ethics (2025)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Meta-HCI: First Workshop on Meta-Research in HCI
Jonas Oppenlaender, Sylvain Malacria, Xinrui Fang, et al.
(2025), pp. 1-8
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
Emerging trends in peer review—a survey
Richard Walker, Pascal Rocha da Silva
Frontiers in Neuroscience (2015) Vol. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 173
Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review
Dakota Murray, Kyle Siler, Vincent Larivière, et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2018)
Open Access | Times Cited: 160
The changing forms and expectations of peer review
Serge P. J. M. Horbach, W. Halffman
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2018) Vol. 3, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 140
Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors
David B. Resnik, Susan A. Elmore
Science and Engineering Ethics (2015) Vol. 22, Iss. 1, pp. 169-188
Closed Access | Times Cited: 137
Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise of “Peer Review” in the Cold War United States
Melinda Baldwin
Isis (2018) Vol. 109, Iss. 3, pp. 538-558
Closed Access | Times Cited: 137
Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review
Samir Haffar, Fateh Bazerbachi, M. Hassan Murad
Mayo Clinic Proceedings (2019) Vol. 94, Iss. 4, pp. 670-676
Open Access | Times Cited: 135
The state of the art in peer review
Jonathan Tennant
FEMS Microbiology Letters (2018) Vol. 365, Iss. 19
Open Access | Times Cited: 131
Data journals: A survey
Leonardo Candela, Donatella Castelli, Paolo Manghi, et al.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2015) Vol. 66, Iss. 9, pp. 1747-1762
Open Access | Times Cited: 119
Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science
Dietmar Wolfram, Peiling Wang, Adam Hembree, et al.
Scientometrics (2020) Vol. 125, Iss. 2, pp. 1033-1051
Open Access | Times Cited: 119
Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
Charles W. Fox, C. Sean Burns, Jennifer Meyer
Functional Ecology (2015) Vol. 30, Iss. 1, pp. 140-153
Open Access | Times Cited: 115
Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures
Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Vincent Larivière, Chaoqun Ni, et al.
Journal of Informetrics (2013) Vol. 7, Iss. 4, pp. 897-906
Closed Access | Times Cited: 111
Peer review and the publication process
Parveen Ali, Roger Watson
Nursing Open (2016) Vol. 3, Iss. 4, pp. 193-202
Open Access | Times Cited: 105
Interpreting ‘Altmetrics’: Viewing Acts on Social Media through the Lens of Citation and Social Theories
Stefanie Haustein, Timothy D. Bowman, Rodrigo Costas
De Gruyter eBooks (2016), pp. 372-406
Open Access | Times Cited: 104
Explicit Bias Toward High-Income-Country Research: A Randomized, Blinded, Crossover Experiment Of English Clinicians
Matthew Harris, Joachim Marti, Hillary Watt, et al.
Health Affairs (2017) Vol. 36, Iss. 11, pp. 1997-2004
Closed Access | Times Cited: 102
What Do Editors Maximize? Evidence from Four Economics Journals
David Card, Stefano DellaVigna
The Review of Economics and Statistics (2019) Vol. 102, Iss. 1, pp. 195-217
Open Access | Times Cited: 102
Is Peer Review a Good Idea?
Remco Heesen, Liam Kofi Bright
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2019) Vol. 72, Iss. 3, pp. 635-663
Open Access | Times Cited: 98
THE ROYAL SOCIETY AND THE PREHISTORY OF PEER REVIEW, 1665–1965
Noah Moxham, Aileen Fyfe
The Historical Journal (2017) Vol. 61, Iss. 4, pp. 863-889
Open Access | Times Cited: 93
The sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review
Misha Teplitskiy, Daniel E. Acuña, Aïda Elamrani-Raoult, et al.
Research Policy (2018) Vol. 47, Iss. 9, pp. 1825-1841
Open Access | Times Cited: 89
Academic misconduct, misrepresentation and gaming: A reassessment
Mario Biagioli, Martín Kenney, Ben R. Martin, et al.
Research Policy (2018) Vol. 48, Iss. 2, pp. 401-413
Open Access | Times Cited: 84
Widening understanding of low embodied impact buildings: Results and recommendations from 80 multi-national quantitative and qualitative case studies
Alice Moncaster, Freja Nygaard Rasmussen, Tove Malmqvist, et al.
Journal of Cleaner Production (2019) Vol. 235, pp. 378-393
Open Access | Times Cited: 77
Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence
Yang Yang, Wu Youyou, Brian Uzzi
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2020) Vol. 117, Iss. 20, pp. 10762-10768
Open Access | Times Cited: 76

Scroll to top