Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Why do farmers join Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes? An Assessment of PES water scheme participation in Brazil
Matheus Alves Zanella, Christian Schleyer, Stijn Speelman
Ecological Economics (2014) Vol. 105, pp. 166-176
Closed Access | Times Cited: 122

Showing 26-50 of 122 citing articles:

Leveraging passive acoustic monitoring for result-based agri-environmental schemes: Opportunities, challenges and next steps
Anna F. Cord, Kevin Darras, Ryo Ogawa, et al.
Biological Conservation (2025) Vol. 305, pp. 111042-111042
Open Access
Modeling willingness to continue participation in payments for ecosystem services programs: A case of China's second phase of the grain for green program in indigenous communities
Lingling Qiu, Shashi Kant, Weizhong Zeng
Forest Policy and Economics (2025) Vol. 174, pp. 103489-103489
Open Access
Farmers’ Preferences for PES Contracts to Adopt Silvopastoral Systems in Southern Ecuador, Revealed Through a Choice Experiment
Leander Raes, Stijn Speelman, Nikolay Aguirre
Environmental Management (2017) Vol. 60, Iss. 2, pp. 200-215
Closed Access | Times Cited: 32
Payments for Ecosystem Services—the Case of Forests
Irina Prokofieva
Current Forestry Reports (2016) Vol. 2, Iss. 2, pp. 130-142
Open Access | Times Cited: 31
Considering farmer land use decisions in efforts to ‘scale up’ Payments for Watershed Services
Ryan C. Richards, Chris Kennedy, Thomas Ε. Lovejoy, et al.
Ecosystem Services (2017) Vol. 23, pp. 238-247
Closed Access | Times Cited: 30
Exploring the connections between participation in and benefits from payments for hydrological services programs in Veracruz State, Mexico
Kelly W. Jones, Sophie Ávila Foucat, Erin C. Pischke, et al.
Ecosystem Services (2018) Vol. 35, pp. 32-42
Closed Access | Times Cited: 30
Farmer perceptions, policy and reforestation in Santa Catarina, Brazil
Adriana Carla Dias Trevisan, Abdon Schmitt-Filho, Joshua Farley, et al.
Ecological Economics (2016) Vol. 130, pp. 53-63
Closed Access | Times Cited: 29
Opportunity cost, income structure, and energy structure for landholders participating in payments for ecosystem services: Evidence from Wolong National Nature Reserve, China
Jichuan Sheng, Qiu Hong, Sanfeng Zhang
World Development (2019) Vol. 117, pp. 230-238
Closed Access | Times Cited: 27
A mixed-methods analysis for improving farmer participation in agri-environmental payments for ecosystem services in Vermont, USA
Gemma Del Rossi, Jory S. Hecht, Asim Zia
Ecosystem Services (2020) Vol. 47, pp. 101223-101223
Closed Access | Times Cited: 26
Can payments for forest environmental services help improve income and attitudes toward forest conservation? Household-level evaluation in the Central Highlands of Vietnam
Van Trương Pham, Saowalak Roongtawanreongsri, Thong Quoc Ho, et al.
Forest Policy and Economics (2021) Vol. 132, pp. 102578-102578
Closed Access | Times Cited: 21
Costs and benefits of restoration are still poorly quantified: evidence from a systematic literature review on the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
Lorenz R. Schimetka, Patricia Ruggiero, Raquel L. Carvalho, et al.
Restoration Ecology (2024) Vol. 32, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Sustainable strategies and circular economy ecosystems: A literature review and future research agenda
Lucio M. Peçanha, João J. Ferreira
Business Strategy and the Environment (2024)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
“I like to conserve the forest, but I also like the cash”. Socioeconomic factors influencing the motivation to be engaged in the Mexican Payment for Environmental Services Programme
Fernanda Figueroa, Ángela Caro-Borrero, Daniel A. Revollo-Fernández, et al.
Journal of Forest Economics (2015) Vol. 22, pp. 36-51
Closed Access | Times Cited: 28
The influence of cash and technical assistance on household-level outcomes in payments for hydrological services programs in Chiapas, Mexico
Kelly W. Jones, Carlos L. Muñoz Brenes, Xoco A. Shinbrot, et al.
Ecosystem Services (2018) Vol. 31, pp. 208-218
Closed Access | Times Cited: 25
Eco-compensation standards for agricultural water conservation: A case study of the paddy land-to-dry land program in China
Moucheng Liu, Lun Yang, Qingwen Min, et al.
Agricultural Water Management (2018) Vol. 204, pp. 192-197
Closed Access | Times Cited: 24
Lessons Learned from the Water Producer Project in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil
Ricardo Augusto Gorne Viani, Henrique Bracale, Denise Taffarello
Forests (2019) Vol. 10, Iss. 11, pp. 1031-1031
Open Access | Times Cited: 24
Spatial prioritization to achieve the triple bottom line in Payment for ecosystem services design
Sofía López‐Cubillos, Rebecca K. Runting, Andrés Felipe Suárez‐Castro, et al.
Ecosystem Services (2022) Vol. 55, pp. 101424-101424
Closed Access | Times Cited: 13
Who participates in conservation incentive programs? Absentee and group landholders are in the mix
Anthelia J. Bond, Patrick O’Connor, Timothy R. Cavagnaro
Land Use Policy (2018) Vol. 72, pp. 410-419
Open Access | Times Cited: 21
The challenges of implementing a legal framework for Payment for Ecosystem Services in Santa Catarina, Brazil
Gisele Garcia Alarcon, Luis Antônio dos Santos de Freitas, Glauber Oliveira da Fountoura, et al.
Natureza & Conservação (2016) Vol. 14, Iss. 2, pp. 132-136
Open Access | Times Cited: 20
Balancing ecological and social goals in PES design – Single objective strategies are not sufficient
Felipe Benra, Laura Nahuelhual, María R. Felipe‐Lucia, et al.
Ecosystem Services (2021) Vol. 53, pp. 101385-101385
Closed Access | Times Cited: 17
Water production in a Brazilian montane rainforest: Implications for water resources management
Jonatas Batista Mattos, Débora Alves Santos, Cézar Augusto Teixeira Falcão Filho, et al.
Environmental Science & Policy (2018) Vol. 84, pp. 52-59
Closed Access | Times Cited: 20
A portfolio analysis of incentive programmes for conservation, restoration and timber plantations in Southern Ecuador
Leander Raes, Marijke D’Haese, Nikolay Aguirre, et al.
Land Use Policy (2015) Vol. 51, pp. 244-259
Closed Access | Times Cited: 19
Identification of Non-economic Influencing Factors Affecting Farmer’s Participation in the Paddy Landto-Dry Land Program in Chicheng County, China
Yuan Yuan, Yanxu Liu, Yi’na Hu, et al.
Sustainability (2017) Vol. 9, Iss. 3, pp. 366-366
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Will PES Schemes Survive in the Long-term Without Evidence of Their Effectiveness? Exploring Four Water-related Cases in Colombia
Letícia Santos de Lima, Pablo Andrés Ramos Barón, Sergio Villamayor‐Tomás, et al.
Ecological Economics (2018) Vol. 156, pp. 211-223
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Protecting the Environment
Samantha De Martino, Florence Kondylis, Astrid Zwager
Public Finance Review (2015) Vol. 45, Iss. 1, pp. 68-96
Open Access | Times Cited: 18

Scroll to top