Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

THE ROYAL SOCIETY AND THE PREHISTORY OF PEER REVIEW, 1665–1965
Noah Moxham, Aileen Fyfe
The Historical Journal (2017) Vol. 61, Iss. 4, pp. 863-889
Open Access | Times Cited: 93

Showing 26-50 of 93 citing articles:

Does peer review improve the statistical content of manuscripts? A study on 27 467 submissions to four journals
Daniel García-Costa, Anabel Forte, Emilia López-Iñesta, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2022) Vol. 9, Iss. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
The Edited Collection
Peter Webster
(2020)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 13
Critical essay: Blinding faith – Paradoxes and pathologies of opacity in peer review
Hugh Willmott
Human Relations (2021) Vol. 75, Iss. 9, pp. 1741-1769
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
10. The Risk of Losing the Thick Description
Erzsébet Tóth-Czifra
Open Book Publishers (2020), pp. 235-266
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Linguistic Variation and Change in 250 Years of English Scientific Writing: A Data-Driven Approach
Yuri Bizzoni, Stefania Degaetano‐Ortlieb, Péter Fankhauser, et al.
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (2020) Vol. 3
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Do peers share the same criteria for assessing grant applications?
Sven E. Hug, Michael Ochsner
Research Evaluation (2021) Vol. 31, Iss. 1, pp. 104-117
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Measuring the effect of reviewers on manuscript change: A study on a sample of submissions to Royal Society journals (2006–2017)
Federico Bianchi, Daniel García-Costa, Francisco Grimaldo, et al.
Journal of Informetrics (2022) Vol. 16, Iss. 3, pp. 101316-101316
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
In Praise of Mistakes
M. Lockwood
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences (2022) Vol. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Ladies, Gentlemen, and Scientific Publication at the Royal Society, 1945–1990
Camilla Mørk Røstvik, Aileen Fyfe
Open Library of Humanities (2018) Vol. 4, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Reading Peer Review
Martin Paul Eve, Cameron Neylon, Daniel Paul O’Donnell, et al.
(2020)
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Digital Histories: Emergent Approaches within the New Digital History

Helsinki University Press eBooks (2020)
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
An openness framework for ex ante evaluation of societal impact of research
Paul Benneworth, Julia Olmos‐Peñuela
Research Evaluation (2022) Vol. 33
Closed Access | Times Cited: 6
How female fellows fared at the Royal Society
Aileen Fyfe, Camilla Mørk Røstvik
Nature (2018) Vol. 555, Iss. 7695, pp. 159-161
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Ten hot topics around scholarly publishing
Jonathan P. Tennan, Harry Crane, Tom Crick, et al.
Bibliosphere (2019), Iss. 3, pp. 3-25
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Editors, referees, and committees: Distributing editorial work at the Royal Society journals in the late 19th and 20th centuries
Aileen Fyfe
Centaurus (2020) Vol. 62, Iss. 1, pp. 125-140
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Certified Amplification: An Emerging Scientific Norm and Ethos
Carole J. Lee
Philosophy of Science (2022) Vol. 89, Iss. 5, pp. 1002-1012
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Scholarly Publication as Scientific Knowledge Production: Vision of the Editors versus Review by Peers
Bjorn Harald Nordtveit
Comparative Education Review (2019) Vol. 63, Iss. 3, pp. 309-314
Closed Access | Times Cited: 6
9. Springing the Floor for a Different Kind of Dance
Jennifer Edmond, Toma Tasovac, Frank Fischer, et al.
Open Book Publishers (2020), pp. 207-234
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Athena Unbound
Peter Baldwin
The MIT Press eBooks (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Peer review: Problematic or promising?
Diana Kelly
The Economic and Labour Relations Review (2023) Vol. 34, Iss. 2, pp. 193-198
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Editors, librarians, and publication exchange: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in the long 19th century
Jenny Beckman
Centaurus (2020) Vol. 62, Iss. 1, pp. 98-110
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
The Royal Society Corpus 6.0: Providing 300+ Years of Scientific Writing for Humanistic Study
Stefan Fischer, Jörg Knappen, Katrin Menzel, et al.
Language Resources and Evaluation (2020), pp. 794-802
Closed Access | Times Cited: 5
Perspectives on double‐blind peer review from collectivist cultural contexts
José Florencio F. Lapeña, Peter L. Munk, A Saw, et al.
The Medical Journal of Australia (2019) Vol. 210, Iss. 8, pp. 347-347
Closed Access | Times Cited: 4
PUBLISHING NATURE IN THE AGE OF REVOLUTIONS: JOSEPH BANKS, GEORG FORSTER, AND THE PLANTS OF THE PACIFIC
Edwin D. Rose
The Historical Journal (2020) Vol. 63, Iss. 5, pp. 1132-1159
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
The business of being an editor: Norman Lockyer, Macmillan and Company, and the editorship of Nature , 1869–1919
Melinda Baldwin
Centaurus (2020) Vol. 62, Iss. 1, pp. 111-124
Closed Access | Times Cited: 4

Scroll to top