Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Can Interparty Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Systematic Test of Different Forms of Intergroup Contact
Magdalena Wojcieszak, Benjamin R. Warner
Political Communication (2020) Vol. 37, Iss. 6, pp. 789-811
Closed Access | Times Cited: 159

Showing 26-50 of 159 citing articles:

Affective polarization and coalition signals
Markus Wagner, Katrin Praprotnik
Political Science Research and Methods (2023) Vol. 12, Iss. 2, pp. 336-353
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Transforming Political Divides: How Student Identities and Campus Contexts Shape Interpartisan Friendships
Alyssa N. Rockenbach, Tara D. Hudson
AERA Open (2024) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Reducing political polarization through narrative writing
Benjamin R. Warner, Haley Kranstuber Horstman, Cassandra Kearney
Journal of Applied Communication Research (2020) Vol. 48, Iss. 4, pp. 459-477
Closed Access | Times Cited: 31
Interventions Reducing Affective Polarization Do Not Necessarily Improve Anti-Democratic Attitudes
Jan G. Voelkel, James Chu, Michael N. Stagnaro, et al.
(2021)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 26
Love thy (partisan) neighbor: Brief befriending meditation reduces affective polarization
Otto Simonsson, Jayanth Narayanan, Joseph Marks
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (2021) Vol. 25, Iss. 6, pp. 1577-1593
Open Access | Times Cited: 24
Intergroup contact reduces affective polarization but not among strong party identifiers
Jens Peter Frølund Thomsen, Anna Håland Thomsen
Scandinavian Political Studies (2022) Vol. 46, Iss. 4, pp. 241-263
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Meditation, Not Information? A Survey Experiment Probing the Effects of Meditation Practice on Affective Polarization and Pro-Environmentalism
Lena Ramstetter, Johannes Klackl, Eva Jonas, et al.
Mindfulness (2025)
Open Access
Content engagement capacity: a network-based approach for evaluating the ability of frames to facilitate political online conversations
Rui Wang, Yotam Ophir, Alexander Semenov, et al.
Information Communication & Society (2025), pp. 1-20
Closed Access
The Effects of Political Exclusion: Threatened Needs and Decreased Affiliation With Increased Anger and Antisocial Inclinations
Katarina E. AuBuchon, Michelle L. Stock, Emily Raibley, et al.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology (2025)
Open Access
Connective Democracy: A New Approach to Fighting Political Divisiveness
Gina Masullo Chen, Martin Riedl
Social Media + Society (2025) Vol. 11, Iss. 1
Open Access
Without the Rules, We Speak Better: Intergroup Contact and Equal Participation Rules Affecting the Deliberativeness of Online Discussion
Taeyoung Kim, Go-eun Kim, Chloe Ahn
Asian Communication Research (2025) Vol. 22, Iss. 1, pp. 23-41
Closed Access
The impact of religious identity on intergroup encounters
Daniëlle Leder, W. van der Vaart, Anja Machielse
Archive for the Psychology of Religion (2025)
Closed Access
The Character of Connection: Platform Affordances and Connective Democracy
Sarah Shugars, Eunbin Ha
Social Media + Society (2025) Vol. 11, Iss. 2
Open Access
How Does Emphasizing Bipartisan Agreement Reduce Affective Polarization? Examining Three Dimensions of Perceived Similarity as Mediators
Suhwoo Ahn, Dustin Carnahan
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media (2025), pp. 1-19
Closed Access
Intellectual humility’s effects on political polarization and engagement
Natalie Jomini Stroud, Caroline Murray
Human Communication Research (2025)
Closed Access
Depolarizing power of anticonformity
Arkadiusz Lipiecki, Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron
Expert Systems with Applications (2025), pp. 127879-127879
Closed Access
We Need to Talk
Matthew Levendusky, Dominik Stecuła
(2021)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 23
Does Talking to the Other Side Reduce Inter-party Hostility? Evidence from Three Studies
Eran Amsalem, Eric Merkley, Peter John Loewen
Political Communication (2021) Vol. 39, Iss. 1, pp. 61-78
Closed Access | Times Cited: 22
Effects of an 8-Week Mindfulness Course on Affective Polarization
Otto Simonsson, Olivier Bazin, Stephen D. Fisher, et al.
Mindfulness (2022) Vol. 13, Iss. 2, pp. 474-483
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Implications of online incidental and selective exposure for political emotions: Affective polarization during elections
Qinfeng Zhu, Brian E. Weeks, Nojin Kwak
New Media & Society (2021) Vol. 26, Iss. 1, pp. 450-472
Open Access | Times Cited: 20
Social Depolarization and Diversity of Opinions—Unified ABM Framework
Paweł Sobkowicz
Entropy (2023) Vol. 25, Iss. 4, pp. 568-568
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Social media, quality of democracy, and citizen satisfaction with democracy in central and eastern Europe
Matthew Placek
Journal of Information Technology & Politics (2023) Vol. 21, Iss. 1, pp. 6-22
Closed Access | Times Cited: 7
Social media news use and polarized partisan perceptions: mediating roles of like-minded and cross-cutting discussion
Xia Zheng, Yanqin Lu, Jae Kook Lee, et al.
Journal of Information Technology & Politics (2024), pp. 1-15
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
Intergroup ethnocentrism and social media: evidence from three Western democracies
Shota Gelovani, Yannis Theocharis, Karolina Koç-Michalska, et al.
Information Communication & Society (2024), pp. 1-19
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Moving beyond us-versus-them polarization towards constructive conversations
Linda M. Doornbosch, Mark van Vuuren, Menno D.T. de Jong
Democratization (2024), pp. 1-27
Open Access | Times Cited: 2

Scroll to top