Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values
Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, et al.
Thinking & Reasoning (2013) Vol. 20, Iss. 2, pp. 188-214
Open Access | Times Cited: 168

Showing 26-50 of 168 citing articles:

Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies
Nick Byrd, Paul Conway
Cognition (2019) Vol. 192, pp. 103995-103995
Open Access | Times Cited: 66
The relation between different types of religiosity and analytic cognitive style
Hasan G. Bahçekapılı, Onurcan Yılmaz
Personality and Individual Differences (2017) Vol. 117, pp. 267-272
Closed Access | Times Cited: 64
Analytic Thinking, Religion, and Prejudice: An Experimental Test of the Dual-Process Model of Mind
Onurcan Yılmaz, Dilay Z. Karadöller, Gamze Sofuoglu
International Journal for the Psychology of Religion (2016) Vol. 26, Iss. 4, pp. 360-369
Open Access | Times Cited: 62
Evaluating the cognitive reflection test as a measure of intuition/reflection, numeracy, and insight problem solving, and the implications for understanding real-world judgments and beliefs.
Niraj Patel, Stephanie Baker, Laura D. Scherer
Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2019) Vol. 148, Iss. 12, pp. 2129-2153
Closed Access | Times Cited: 60
Social metacognition in moral judgment: Decisional conflict promotes perspective taking.
André Mata
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2019) Vol. 117, Iss. 6, pp. 1061-1082
Closed Access | Times Cited: 56
Exploring the roles of analytic cognitive style, climate science literacy, illusion of knowledge, and political orientation in climate change skepticism
Bastien Trémolière, Hakim Djeriouat
Journal of Environmental Psychology (2021) Vol. 74, pp. 101561-101561
Open Access | Times Cited: 46
Are good reasoners more incest-friendly? Trait cognitive reflection predicts selective moralization in a sample of American adults
Edward B. Royzman, Justin F. Landy, Geoffrey P. Goodwin
Judgment and Decision Making (2014) Vol. 9, Iss. 3, pp. 176-190
Open Access | Times Cited: 66
Reflective minds and open hearts: Cognitive style and personality predict religiosity and spiritual thinking in a community sample
Matthew Browne, Gordon Pennycook, Belinda C. Goodwin, et al.
European Journal of Social Psychology (2014) Vol. 44, Iss. 7, pp. 736-742
Closed Access | Times Cited: 61
Evidence that analytic cognitive style influences religious belief: Comment on Razmyar and Reeve (2013)
Gordon Pennycook
Intelligence (2014) Vol. 43, pp. 21-26
Closed Access | Times Cited: 56
Activating analytic thinking enhances the value given to individualizing moral foundations
Onurcan Yılmaz, S. Adil Sarıbay
Cognition (2017) Vol. 165, pp. 88-96
Closed Access | Times Cited: 55
Analytic atheism: A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?
Will M. Gervais, Michiel van Elk, Dimitris Xygalatas, et al.
(2017)
Open Access | Times Cited: 53
Better but still biased: Analytic cognitive style and belief bias
Dries Trippas, Gordon Pennycook, Michael F. Verde, et al.
Thinking & Reasoning (2015) Vol. 21, Iss. 4, pp. 431-445
Open Access | Times Cited: 51
On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs
Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Derek J. Koehler, et al.
(2019)
Open Access | Times Cited: 48
Moral concerns are differentially observable in language
Brendan Kennedy, Mohammad Atari, Aida Mostafazadeh Davani, et al.
Cognition (2021) Vol. 212, pp. 104696-104696
Open Access | Times Cited: 37
How to activate intuitive and reflective thinking in behavior research? A comprehensive examination of experimental techniques
Ozan İşler, Onurcan Yılmaz
Behavior Research Methods (2022) Vol. 55, Iss. 7, pp. 3679-3698
Open Access | Times Cited: 27
Analytical thinking style leads to more utilitarian moral judgments: An exploration with a process-dissociation approach
Zhongquan Li, Shiyu Xia, Xiao‐Yuan Wu, et al.
Personality and Individual Differences (2018) Vol. 131, pp. 180-184
Closed Access | Times Cited: 43
Representations of moral violations: Category members and associated features
Justin F. Landy
Judgment and Decision Making (2016) Vol. 11, Iss. 5, pp. 496-508
Open Access | Times Cited: 39
Susceptibility to Partisan Fake News Is Explained More by a Lack of Deliberation Than by Willful Ignorance
Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand
SSRN Electronic Journal (2018)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 39
Activating reflective thinking with decision justification and debiasing training
Ozan İşler, Onurcan Yılmaz, Burak Doğruyol
Judgment and Decision Making (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 6, pp. 926-938
Open Access | Times Cited: 36
A reflection on cognitive reflection – testing convergent/divergent validity of two measures of cognitive reflection
Nikola Erceg, Zvonimir Galić, Mitja Ružojčić
Judgment and Decision Making (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 5, pp. 741-755
Open Access | Times Cited: 34
Do cognitive styles affect vaccine hesitancy? A dual-process cognitive framework for vaccine hesitancy and the role of risk perceptions
Mauro Martinelli, Giuseppe Veltri
Social Science & Medicine (2021) Vol. 289, pp. 114403-114403
Closed Access | Times Cited: 31
Dueling with Dual-Process Models: Cognition, Creativity, and Context
Gordon Brett
Sociological Theory (2022) Vol. 40, Iss. 2, pp. 179-201
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Moral minds: How and when does servant leadership influence employees to benefit multiple stakeholders?
G. James Lemoine, Chad A. Hartnell, Snehal Hora, et al.
Personnel Psychology (2023) Vol. 77, Iss. 3, pp. 1055-1085
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Creativity and Cognitive Skills among Millennials: Thinking Too Much and Creating Too Little
Brice Corgnet, Antonio M. Espín, Roberto Hérnan-Gonzalez
Frontiers in Psychology (2016) Vol. 7
Open Access | Times Cited: 38
Individual differences in reliance on intuition predict harsher moral judgments.
Sarah Ward, Laura A. King
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2017) Vol. 114, Iss. 5, pp. 825-849
Closed Access | Times Cited: 35

Scroll to top