Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology
Timothy M. Errington, Maya B Mathur, Courtney K. Soderberg, et al.
eLife (2021) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 154

Showing 26-50 of 154 citing articles:

Toward Open and Reproducible Epidemiology
Maya B Mathur, Matthew P. Fox
American Journal of Epidemiology (2023) Vol. 192, Iss. 4, pp. 658-664
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Obtaining miRNA from Saliva—Comparison of Sampling and Purification Methods
Aintzane Urbizu, Laura Arnaldo, Katrin Beyer
International Journal of Molecular Sciences (2023) Vol. 24, Iss. 3, pp. 2386-2386
Open Access | Times Cited: 13
Building reproducible bridges to cross the “valley of death”
Timothy M. Errington
Journal of Clinical Investigation (2024) Vol. 134, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Reproducibility, Replicability and Repeatability: A survey of reproducible research with a focus on high performance computing
Benjamin Antunes, David R.C. Hill
Computer Science Review (2024) Vol. 53, pp. 100655-100655
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Half of top cancer studies fail high-profile reproducibility effort
Asher Mullard
Nature (2021) Vol. 600, Iss. 7889, pp. 368-369
Open Access | Times Cited: 30
Proposal of a Selection Protocol for Replication of Studies in Sports and Exercise Science
Jennifer Murphy, Cristian Mesquida, Aaron R. Caldwell, et al.
Sports Medicine (2022) Vol. 53, Iss. 1, pp. 281-291
Open Access | Times Cited: 22
How often do cancer researchers make their data and code available and what factors are associated with sharing?
Daniel G. Hamilton, Matthew J. Page, Sue Finch, et al.
BMC Medicine (2022) Vol. 20, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
A systematic assessment of preclinical multilaboratory studies and a comparison to single laboratory studies
Victoria Hunniford, Agnes Grudniewicz, Dean Fergusson, et al.
eLife (2023) Vol. 12
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Large inherent variability in data derived from highly standardised cell culture experiments
Ian Reddin, Tim R. Fenton, Mark N. Wass, et al.
Pharmacological Research (2023) Vol. 188, pp. 106671-106671
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Designing, conducting, and reporting reproducible animal experiments
Emma Wilson, Fiona J. Ramage, Kimberley E. Wever, et al.
Journal of Endocrinology (2023) Vol. 258, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Care to share? Experimental evidence on code sharing behavior in the social sciences
Daniel Krähmer, Laura Schächtele, Andreas Schneck
PLoS ONE (2023) Vol. 18, Iss. 8, pp. e0289380-e0289380
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Robustness and reproducibility for AI learning in biomedical sciences: RENOIR
Alessandro Barberis, Hugo J.W.L. Aerts, Francesca M. Buffa
Scientific Reports (2024) Vol. 14, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science
Lukas Röseler, Leonard Kaiser, Christopher Albert Doetsch, et al.
(2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Poor hypotheses and research waste in biology: learning from a theory crisis in psychology
Shinichi Nakagawa, David Armitage, Tom Froese, et al.
BMC Biology (2025) Vol. 23, Iss. 1
Open Access
The Artificial Social Agent Questionnaire (ASAQ) - Development and evaluation of a validated instrument for capturing human interaction experiences with artificial social agents
Siska Fitrianie, Merijn Bruijnes, Amal Abdulrahman, et al.
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2025), pp. 103482-103482
Closed Access
A three-stage strategy for conducting an experimental investigation: A recommendation to improve the reproducibility of reported conclusions
Simon T. Bate, S. Clare Stanford, Lindsay C. Page
Journal of Psychopharmacology (2025)
Closed Access
Testing the reproducibility of ecological studies on insect behavior in a multi-laboratory setting identifies opportunities for improving experimental rigor
Carolin Mundinger, Nora K. E. Schulz, Pragya Singh, et al.
PLoS Biology (2025) Vol. 23, Iss. 4, pp. e3003019-e3003019
Open Access
A Workflow to Achieve Saturation of Fluorophore‐Conjugated Monoclonal Antibodies for Robust Comparison of Biomarker Expression
Natalie J. Smith, Helen M. McGuire, Barbara Fazekas de St Groth
Cytometry Part A (2025)
Open Access
What have we learned?
Peter Rodgers, Andy Collings
eLife (2021) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 24
Predicting and reasoning about replicability using structured groups
Bonnie C. Wintle, Eden T. Smith, Martin Bush, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2023) Vol. 10, Iss. 6
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Doing better leadership science via replications and registered reports
Melissa K. Carsten, Rachel Clapp‐Smith, S. Alexander Haslam, et al.
The Leadership Quarterly (2023) Vol. 34, Iss. 4, pp. 101712-101712
Closed Access | Times Cited: 9
CheckMyMetal (CMM): validating metal-binding sites in X-ray and cryo-EM data
Michał Gucwa, Vanessa Bijak, Heping Zheng, et al.
IUCrJ (2024) Vol. 11, Iss. 5, pp. 871-877
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports
Randall J. Ellis
eNeuro (2022) Vol. 9, Iss. 4, pp. ENEURO.0017-22.2022
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
Lessons from a catalogue of 6674 brain recordings
Alexis D. J. Makin, John Tyson‐Carr, Giulia Rampone, et al.
eLife (2022) Vol. 11
Open Access | Times Cited: 14
Reproducible variability: assessing investigator discordance across 9 research teams attempting to reproduce the same observational study
Anna Ostropolets, Yasser Albogami, Mitchell M. Conover, et al.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (2023) Vol. 30, Iss. 5, pp. 859-868
Closed Access | Times Cited: 9

Scroll to top