Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Bias in peer review
Carole J. Lee, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Guo Zhang, et al.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2012) Vol. 64, Iss. 1, pp. 2-17
Closed Access | Times Cited: 843

Showing 51-75 of 843 citing articles:

Is the future of peer review automated?
Robert Schulz, Adrian Barnett, René Bernard, et al.
BMC Research Notes (2022) Vol. 15, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 58
How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought
Ludo Waltman, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Stephen Pinfield, et al.
Learned Publishing (2023) Vol. 36, Iss. 3, pp. 334-347
Open Access | Times Cited: 39
Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Karen B. Schmaling, Stephen A. Gallo
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2023) Vol. 8, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 37
The future of academic publishing
Abubakari Ahmed, Aceil Al‐Khatib, Yap Boum, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2023) Vol. 7, Iss. 7, pp. 1021-1026
Closed Access | Times Cited: 25
The forced battle between peer-review and scientometric research assessment: Why the CoARA initiative is unsound
Giovanni Abramo
Research Evaluation (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Unmasking Favoritism and Bias in Academic Publishing: An Empirical Study on Editorial Practices
Abhinandan Kulal, N Abhishek, P. Shareena, et al.
Public Integrity (2025), pp. 1-22
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
The female finance penalty: Why are women less successful in academic finance than related fields?
Chris Brooks, Lisa Schopohl, Ran Tao, et al.
Research Policy (2025) Vol. 54, Iss. 4, pp. 105207-105207
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Societal impact evaluation: Exploring evaluator perceptions of the characterization of impact under the REF2014: Table 1.
Gabrielle Samuel, Gemma Derrick
Research Evaluation (2015) Vol. 24, Iss. 3, pp. 229-241
Open Access | Times Cited: 90
Unconceived alternatives and conservatism in science: the impact of professionalization, peer-review, and Big Science
P. Kyle Stanford
Synthese (2015) Vol. 196, Iss. 10, pp. 3915-3932
Open Access | Times Cited: 82
What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?
Susan Guthrie, Ioana Ghiga, Steven Wooding
F1000Research (2018) Vol. 6, pp. 1335-1335
Open Access | Times Cited: 82
Commensuration Bias in Peer Review
Carole J. Lee
Philosophy of Science (2015) Vol. 82, Iss. 5, pp. 1272-1283
Closed Access | Times Cited: 81
A persistent lack of international representation on editorial boards in environmental biology
Johanna Espín, Sebastian Palmas, Farah Carrasco‐Rueda, et al.
PLoS Biology (2017) Vol. 15, Iss. 12, pp. e2002760-e2002760
Open Access | Times Cited: 78
Gender and international diversity improves equity in peer review
Dakota Murray, Kyle Siler, Vincent Larivière, et al.
(2018), pp. 400515
Open Access | Times Cited: 77
From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review
David Pontille, Didier Torny
Human Studies (2014) Vol. 38, Iss. 1, pp. 57-79
Open Access | Times Cited: 75
Drivers of citations: An analysis of publications in “top” accounting journals
Matthias Meyer, Rüdiger W. Waldkirch, Irina Duscher, et al.
Critical Perspectives on Accounting (2017) Vol. 51, pp. 24-46
Closed Access | Times Cited: 75
Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web
Mike Thelwall, Kayvan Kousha
El Profesional de la Informacion (2015) Vol. 24, Iss. 5, pp. 587-587
Open Access | Times Cited: 74
Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers
Andrea Chiarelli, Rob Johnson, Stephen Pinfield, et al.
F1000Research (2019) Vol. 8, pp. 971-971
Open Access | Times Cited: 74
Bias in Research Grant Evaluation Has Dire Consequences for Small Universities
Dennis L. Murray, Douglas W. Morris, Claude Lavoie, et al.
PLoS ONE (2016) Vol. 11, Iss. 6, pp. e0155876-e0155876
Open Access | Times Cited: 73
Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?
Rafael D’Andrea, James P. O’Dwyer
PLoS ONE (2017) Vol. 12, Iss. 10, pp. e0186111-e0186111
Open Access | Times Cited: 73
The good, the bad and the rude peer-review
Andreas F. Mavrogenis, Andrew Quaile, Marius M. Scarlat
International Orthopaedics (2020) Vol. 44, Iss. 3, pp. 413-415
Open Access | Times Cited: 68
Ten considerations for open peer review
Birgit Schmidt, Tony Ross‐Hellauer, Xenia van Edig, et al.
F1000Research (2018) Vol. 7, pp. 969-969
Open Access | Times Cited: 67
Use of Checklists in Reviews of Health Economic Evaluations, 2010 to 2018
Rory Watts, Ian Li
Value in Health (2018) Vol. 22, Iss. 3, pp. 377-382
Open Access | Times Cited: 67
Scientific Eminence
Alice H. Eagly, David I. Miller
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2016) Vol. 11, Iss. 6, pp. 899-904
Closed Access | Times Cited: 66
Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers
Blanca Rodríguez Bravo, David Nicholas, Eti Herman, et al.
Learned Publishing (2017) Vol. 30, Iss. 4, pp. 269-277
Open Access | Times Cited: 66
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for unaware fear conditioning
Gaëtan Mertens, Iris M. Engelhard
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (2019) Vol. 108, pp. 254-268
Open Access | Times Cited: 65

Scroll to top