OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Karen M. Douglas, Clara De Inocencio
European Journal of Social Psychology (2017) Vol. 48, Iss. 3, pp. 320-335
Open Access | Times Cited: 291

Showing 1-25 of 291 citing articles:

Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Karen M. Douglas, Joseph E. Uscinski, Robbie M. Sutton, et al.
Political Psychology (2019) Vol. 40, Iss. S1, pp. 3-35
Open Access | Times Cited: 1181

Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Karen M. Douglas
European Journal of Social Psychology (2018) Vol. 48, Iss. 7, pp. 897-908
Open Access | Times Cited: 389

COVID-19 conspiracy theories
Karen M. Douglas
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (2021) Vol. 24, Iss. 2, pp. 270-275
Closed Access | Times Cited: 345

Conspiracy Theories: Evolved Functions and Psychological Mechanisms
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Mark van Vugt
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2018) Vol. 13, Iss. 6, pp. 770-788
Open Access | Times Cited: 327

COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with perceived stress and pre-existing conspiracy beliefs
Neophytos Georgiou, Paul Delfabbro, Ryan Balzan
Personality and Individual Differences (2020) Vol. 166, pp. 110201-110201
Open Access | Times Cited: 275

Exposure to intergroup conspiracy theories promotes prejudice which spreads across groups
Daniel Jolley, Rose Meleady, Karen M. Douglas
British Journal of Psychology (2019) Vol. 111, Iss. 1, pp. 17-35
Open Access | Times Cited: 223

Conspiracy theories and the conspiracy mindset: implications for political ideology
Robbie M. Sutton, Karen M. Douglas
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (2020) Vol. 34, pp. 118-122
Open Access | Times Cited: 204

Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational
Tomas Ståhl, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen
Personality and Individual Differences (2017) Vol. 122, pp. 155-163
Open Access | Times Cited: 199

An Existential Threat Model of Conspiracy Theories
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen
European Psychologist (2019) Vol. 25, Iss. 1, pp. 16-25
Open Access | Times Cited: 194

Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID‐19 pandemic
Predrag Teovanović, Petar Lukić, Zorana Zupan, et al.
Applied Cognitive Psychology (2020) Vol. 35, Iss. 2, pp. 486-496
Open Access | Times Cited: 173

What Are Conspiracy Theories? A Definitional Approach to Their Correlates, Consequences, and Communication
Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton
Annual Review of Psychology (2022) Vol. 74, Iss. 1, pp. 271-298
Open Access | Times Cited: 168

The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories
Anni Sternisko, Aleksandra Cichocka, Jay J. Van Bavel
Current Opinion in Psychology (2020) Vol. 35, pp. 1-6
Open Access | Times Cited: 153

Mistrust and misinformation: A two-component, socio-epistemic model of belief in conspiracy theories
Joseph M. Pierre
Journal of Social and Political Psychology (2020) Vol. 8, Iss. 2, pp. 617-641
Open Access | Times Cited: 142

The Case for Rage
Myisha Cherry
Oxford University Press eBooks (2021)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 126

Toward Parsimony in Bias Research: A Proposed Common Framework of Belief-Consistent Information Processing for a Set of Biases
Aileen Oeberst, Roland Imhoff
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2023) Vol. 18, Iss. 6, pp. 1464-1487
Open Access | Times Cited: 78

Populist Gullibility: Conspiracy Theories, News Credibility, Bullshit Receptivity, and Paranormal Belief
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Talia Cohen Rodrigues, Carlotta Bunzel, et al.
Political Psychology (2022) Vol. 43, Iss. 6, pp. 1061-1079
Open Access | Times Cited: 71

The efficacy of interventions in reducing belief in conspiracy theories: A systematic review
Cian O’Mahony, Maryanne Brassil, Gillian Murphy, et al.
PLoS ONE (2023) Vol. 18, Iss. 4, pp. e0280902-e0280902
Open Access | Times Cited: 49

Why conspiracy theories matter: A social psychological analysis
Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton
European Review of Social Psychology (2018) Vol. 29, Iss. 1, pp. 256-298
Open Access | Times Cited: 124

Anxious attachment and belief in conspiracy theories
Ricky Green, Karen M. Douglas
Personality and Individual Differences (2018) Vol. 125, pp. 30-37
Closed Access | Times Cited: 117

The entertainment value of conspiracy theories
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Joline Ligthart, Sabine Rosema, et al.
British Journal of Psychology (2021) Vol. 113, Iss. 1, pp. 25-48
Open Access | Times Cited: 96

Conspiracy beliefs in the general population: The importance of psychopathology, cognitive style and educational attainment
Neophytos Georgiou, Paul Delfabbro, Ryan Balzan
Personality and Individual Differences (2019) Vol. 151, pp. 109521-109521
Closed Access | Times Cited: 95

Pathways to conspiracy: The social and linguistic precursors of involvement in Reddit’s conspiracy theory forum
Colin Klein, Peter Clutton, Adam G. Dunn
PLoS ONE (2019) Vol. 14, Iss. 11, pp. e0225098-e0225098
Open Access | Times Cited: 94

Are Conspiracy Theories Harmless?
Karen M. Douglas
The Spanish Journal of Psychology (2021) Vol. 24
Open Access | Times Cited: 78

Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top