Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Freshwater biomonitoring in the Information Age
François Keck, Valentin Vasselon, Kálmán Tapolczai, et al.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (2017) Vol. 15, Iss. 5, pp. 266-274
Open Access | Times Cited: 130

Showing 1-25 of 130 citing articles:

The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: Integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems
Jan Pawłowski, Mary Kelly‐Quinn, Florian Altermatt, et al.
The Science of The Total Environment (2018) Vol. 637-638, pp. 1295-1310
Open Access | Times Cited: 476
DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work
Hannah Weigand, Arne J. Beermann, Fedor Čiampor, et al.
The Science of The Total Environment (2019) Vol. 678, pp. 499-524
Open Access | Times Cited: 464
Implementation options for DNA-based identification into ecological status assessment under the European Water Framework Directive
Daniel Hering, Ángel Borja, J. Iwan Jones, et al.
Water Research (2018) Vol. 138, pp. 192-205
Open Access | Times Cited: 385
Assessing ecological status with diatoms DNA metabarcoding: Scaling-up on a WFD monitoring network (Mayotte island, France)
Valentin Vasselon, Frédéric Rimet, Kálmán Tapolczai, et al.
Ecological Indicators (2017) Vol. 82, pp. 1-12
Closed Access | Times Cited: 181
Expanding ecological assessment by integrating microorganisms into routine freshwater biomonitoring
Markéta Ságová‐Marečková, Jens Boenigk, Agnès Bouchez, et al.
Water Research (2020) Vol. 191, pp. 116767-116767
Open Access | Times Cited: 173
Meta‐analysis shows both congruence and complementarity of DNA and eDNA metabarcoding to traditional methods for biological community assessment
François Keck, Rosetta C. Blackman, Raphaël Bossart, et al.
Molecular Ecology (2022) Vol. 31, Iss. 6, pp. 1820-1835
Open Access | Times Cited: 152
Fishing for fish environmental DNA: Ecological applications, methodological considerations, surveying designs, and ways forward
Meng Yao, Shan Zhang, Qi Lu, et al.
Molecular Ecology (2022) Vol. 31, Iss. 20, pp. 5132-5164
Closed Access | Times Cited: 109
Towards a multisensor station for automated biodiversity monitoring
J. Wolfgang Wägele, Paul Bodesheim, Sarah J. Bourlat, et al.
Basic and Applied Ecology (2022) Vol. 59, pp. 105-138
Open Access | Times Cited: 77
Navigating the seven challenges of taxonomic reference databases in metabarcoding analyses
François Keck, Marjorie Couton, Florian Altermatt
Molecular Ecology Resources (2022) Vol. 23, Iss. 4, pp. 742-755
Closed Access | Times Cited: 77
Why We Need Sustainable Networks Bridging Countries, Disciplines, Cultures and Generations for Aquatic Biomonitoring 2.0: A Perspective Derived From the DNAqua-Net COST Action
Florian Leese, Agnès Bouchez, Kessy Abarenkov, et al.
Advances in ecological research/Advances in Ecological Research (2018), pp. 63-99
Open Access | Times Cited: 152
Adapting metabarcoding-based benthic biomonitoring into routine marine ecological status assessment networks
Eva Aylagas, Ángel Borja, Iñigo Muxika, et al.
Ecological Indicators (2018) Vol. 95, pp. 194-202
Closed Access | Times Cited: 147
Optimizing environmental DNA sampling effort for fish inventories in tropical streams and rivers
Isabel Cantera, Kévin Cilleros, Alice Valentini, et al.
Scientific Reports (2019) Vol. 9, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 133
Avoiding quantification bias in metabarcoding: Application of a cell biovolume correction factor in diatom molecular biomonitoring
Valentin Vasselon, Agnès Bouchez, Frédéric Rimet, et al.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution (2017) Vol. 9, Iss. 4, pp. 1060-1069
Open Access | Times Cited: 130
Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk‐sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers
Jan‐Niklas Macher, Aurélien Vivancos, Jeremy J. Piggott, et al.
Molecular Ecology Resources (2018) Vol. 18, Iss. 6, pp. 1456-1468
Closed Access | Times Cited: 123
Studying Ecosystems With DNA Metabarcoding: Lessons From Biomonitoring of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates
Alex Bush, Zacchaeus G. Compson, Wendy A. Monk, et al.
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (2019) Vol. 7
Open Access | Times Cited: 114
Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species
Lu Shu, Arne Ludwig, Zuogang Peng
Genes (2020) Vol. 11, Iss. 3, pp. 296-296
Open Access | Times Cited: 108
A cross-taxa study using environmental DNA/RNA metabarcoding to measure biological impacts of offshore oil and gas drilling and production operations
Olivier Laroche, Susanna A. Wood, Louis A. Tremblay, et al.
Marine Pollution Bulletin (2017) Vol. 127, pp. 97-107
Closed Access | Times Cited: 105
Improved freshwater macroinvertebrate detection from environmental DNA through minimized nontarget amplification
Florian Leese, Mandy Sander, Dominik Buchner, et al.
Environmental DNA (2020) Vol. 3, Iss. 1, pp. 261-276
Open Access | Times Cited: 105
Uncovering the complete biodiversity structure in spatial networks: the example of riverine systems
Florian Altermatt, Chelsea J. Little, Elvira Mächler, et al.
Oikos (2020) Vol. 129, Iss. 5, pp. 607-618
Open Access | Times Cited: 97
eDNA as a tool for identifying freshwater species in sustainable forestry: A critical review and potential future applications
Ashley A. Coble, Camille Flinders, Jessica A. Homyack, et al.
The Science of The Total Environment (2018) Vol. 649, pp. 1157-1170
Closed Access | Times Cited: 87
The Observatory on LAkes (OLA) database: Sixty years of environmental data accessible to the public
Frédéric Rimet, Orlane Anneville, Denis Barbet, et al.
Journal of Limnology (2020) Vol. 79, Iss. 2
Open Access | Times Cited: 87
Key Questions for Next-Generation Biomonitoring
Andreas Makiola, Zacchaeus G. Compson, Donald J. Baird, et al.
Frontiers in Environmental Science (2020) Vol. 7
Open Access | Times Cited: 78
Microplastic Pollution in Water Systems: Characteristics and Control Methods
Hao Ma, Liqiang Chao, Hang Wan, et al.
Diversity (2024) Vol. 16, Iss. 1, pp. 70-70
Open Access | Times Cited: 13
Diatom DNA Metabarcoding for Biomonitoring: Strategies to Avoid Major Taxonomical and Bioinformatical Biases Limiting Molecular Indices Capacities
Kálmán Tapolczai, François Keck, Agnès Bouchez, et al.
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (2019) Vol. 7
Open Access | Times Cited: 76
Molecular versus morphological data for benthic diatoms biomonitoring in Northern Europe freshwater and consequences for ecological status
Bonnie Bailet, Agnès Bouchez, Alain Franc, et al.
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics (2019) Vol. 3
Open Access | Times Cited: 69
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top