Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Harmful situations, impure people: An attribution asymmetry across moral domains
Alek Chakroff, Liane Young
Cognition (2014) Vol. 136, pp. 30-37
Closed Access | Times Cited: 76

Showing 1-25 of 76 citing articles:

Purity homophily in social networks.
Morteza Dehghani, KATE JOHNSON, Joe Hoover, et al.
Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2016) Vol. 145, Iss. 3, pp. 366-375
Closed Access | Times Cited: 164
Deconstructing intent to reconstruct morality
Fiery Cushman
Current Opinion in Psychology (2015) Vol. 6, pp. 97-103
Closed Access | Times Cited: 119
How We Know What Not To Think
Jonathan Phillips, Adam Morris, Fiery Cushman
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2019) Vol. 23, Iss. 12, pp. 1026-1040
Open Access | Times Cited: 102
A comparison of dietarian identity profiles between vegetarians and vegans
Daniel L. Rosenfeld
Food Quality and Preference (2018) Vol. 72, pp. 40-44
Closed Access | Times Cited: 87
The Problem of Purity in Moral Psychology
Kurt Gray, Nicholas DiMaggio, Chelsea Schein, et al.
Personality and Social Psychology Review (2022) Vol. 27, Iss. 3, pp. 272-308
Open Access | Times Cited: 57
When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts
Alek Chakroff, James Dungan, Jorie Koster-Hale, et al.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (2015) Vol. 11, Iss. 3, pp. 476-484
Open Access | Times Cited: 70
Moral judgment as information processing: an integrative review
Steve Guglielmo
Frontiers in Psychology (2015) Vol. 6
Open Access | Times Cited: 67
Disgust sensitivity is primarily associated with purity-based moral judgments.
Fieke M. A. Wagemans, Mark J. Brandt, Marcel Zeelenberg
Emotion (2017) Vol. 18, Iss. 2, pp. 277-289
Open Access | Times Cited: 67
The psychological representation of modality
Jonathan Phillips, Joshua Knobe
Mind & Language (2018) Vol. 33, Iss. 1, pp. 65-94
Open Access | Times Cited: 61
What Makes Moral Disgust Special? An Integrative Functional Review
Roger Giner‐Sorolla, Tom R. Kupfer, John S. Sabo
Advances in experimental social psychology (2017), pp. 223-289
Open Access | Times Cited: 58
The search for predictable moral partners: Predictability and moral (character) preferences
Martin Harry Turpin, Alexander C. Walker, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, et al.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2021) Vol. 97, pp. 104196-104196
Closed Access | Times Cited: 33
Quantifying moral foundations from various topics on Twitter conversations
Rishemjit Kaur, Kazutoshi Sasahara
2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (2016)
Open Access | Times Cited: 39
Deconstructing moral character judgments
Rachel Hartman, Will Blakey, Kurt Gray
Current Opinion in Psychology (2021) Vol. 43, pp. 205-212
Closed Access | Times Cited: 30
Victimhood: The most powerful force in morality and politics
Kurt Gray, Emily Kubin
Advances in experimental social psychology (2024), pp. 137-220
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
From impure to harmful: Asymmetric expectations about immoral agents
Alek Chakroff, Pascale Sophie Russell, Jared Piazza, et al.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2016) Vol. 69, pp. 201-209
Open Access | Times Cited: 35
Explaining Away Differences in Moral Judgment
Jesse Graham
Social Psychological and Personality Science (2015) Vol. 6, Iss. 8, pp. 869-873
Closed Access | Times Cited: 34
Brain Preservation and Cryonics Through the Lens of Moral Psychology
Alexander German, Max Tretter
Neuroethics (2025) Vol. 18, Iss. 1
Open Access
The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions
James Dungan, Alek Chakroff, Liane Young
PLoS ONE (2017) Vol. 12, Iss. 3, pp. e0173405-e0173405
Open Access | Times Cited: 31
Imagining wrong: Fictitious contexts mitigate condemnation of harm more than impurity.
John S. Sabo, Roger Giner‐Sorolla
Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2017) Vol. 146, Iss. 1, pp. 134-153
Open Access | Times Cited: 30
Specks of Dirt and Tons of Pain: Dosage Distinguishes Impurity From Harm
Joshua Rottman, Liane Young
Psychological Science (2019) Vol. 30, Iss. 8, pp. 1151-1160
Closed Access | Times Cited: 28
Moral Values Reveal the Causality Implicit in Verb Meaning
Laura Niemi, Joshua K. Hartshorne, Tobias Gerstenberg, et al.
Cognitive Science (2020) Vol. 44, Iss. 6
Open Access | Times Cited: 26
The Effect of Cognitive Load on Intent‐Based Moral Judgment
Justin W. Martin, Marine Buon, Fiery Cushman
Cognitive Science (2021) Vol. 45, Iss. 4
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
Splintering the gamer’s dilemma: moral intuitions, motivational assumptions, and action prototypes
Jens Kjeldgaard‐Christiansen
Ethics and Information Technology (2019) Vol. 22, Iss. 1, pp. 93-102
Closed Access | Times Cited: 23
What We Talk About When We Talk About Morality
Melissa A. Wheeler, Simon M. Laham
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2016) Vol. 42, Iss. 9, pp. 1206-1216
Closed Access | Times Cited: 22
Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding
Steve Guglielmo
Cognition (2017) Vol. 170, pp. 334-337
Closed Access | Times Cited: 22
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top