Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Probing the grounds: Developing a payment-by-results agri-environment scheme in Finland
Traci Birge, Marjaana Toivonen, Minna Kaljonen, et al.
Land Use Policy (2016) Vol. 61, pp. 302-315
Closed Access | Times Cited: 48

Showing 1-25 of 48 citing articles:

Time to look for evidence: Results-based approach to biodiversity conservation on farmland in Europe
Irina Herzon, Traci Birge, B. Allen, et al.
Land Use Policy (2017) Vol. 71, pp. 347-354
Closed Access | Times Cited: 143
Back to the future: rethinking socioecological systems underlying high nature value farmlands
Ângela Lomba, Francisco Moreira, Sebastian Klimek, et al.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (2019) Vol. 18, Iss. 1, pp. 36-42
Open Access | Times Cited: 106
Perceived ecosystem services synergies, trade-offs, and bundles in European high nature value farming landscapes
Tobías Plieninger, Mario Torralba, Tibor Hartel, et al.
Landscape Ecology (2019) Vol. 34, Iss. 7, pp. 1565-1581
Closed Access | Times Cited: 99
Biodiversity indicators for result-based agri-environmental schemes – Current state and future prospects
By Noëmi Elmiger, Robert Finger, Jaboury Ghazoul, et al.
Agricultural Systems (2022) Vol. 204, pp. 103538-103538
Open Access | Times Cited: 47
Agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity and environmental protection: How we are not yet “hitting the right keys”
Emmanouil Tyllianakis, Julia Martin‐Ortega
Land Use Policy (2021) Vol. 109, pp. 105620-105620
Open Access | Times Cited: 51
Farmers’ preferences toward an outcome‐based payment for ecosystem service scheme in Japan
Katsuya Tanaka, Nick Hanley, Laure Kühfuss
Journal of Agricultural Economics (2022) Vol. 73, Iss. 3, pp. 720-738
Open Access | Times Cited: 30
Incentives, Rewards or Both in Payments for Ecosystem Services: Drawing a Link Between Farmers' Preferences and Biodiversity Levels
Carolin Canessa, Terese E. Venus, Miriam Wiesmeier, et al.
Ecological Economics (2023) Vol. 213, pp. 107954-107954
Closed Access | Times Cited: 20
The impact of agri-environment schemes on farm productivity: a DID-matching approach
Philipp Mennig, Johannes Sauer
European Review of Agricultural Economics (2019) Vol. 47, Iss. 3, pp. 1045-1093
Closed Access | Times Cited: 53
Farmers’ heterogeneous preferences towards results-based environmental policies
Olli Niskanen, Annika Tienhaara, Emmi Haltia, et al.
Land Use Policy (2020) Vol. 102, pp. 105227-105227
Closed Access | Times Cited: 47
Farmers’ preferences for result-based schemes for grassland conservation in Slovenia
Tanja Šumrada, Anže Japelj, Miroslav Verbič, et al.
Journal for Nature Conservation (2022) Vol. 66, pp. 126143-126143
Open Access | Times Cited: 27
Institutional analysis of actors involved in the governance of innovative contracts for agri-environmental and climate schemes
Claudia Sattler, Rena Barghusen, Birte Bredemeier, et al.
Global Environmental Change (2023) Vol. 80, pp. 102668-102668
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
The legitimacy of result-oriented and action-oriented agri-environmental schemes: A comparison of farmers’ and citizens’ perceptions
Annukka Vainio, Annika Tienhaara, Emmi Haltia, et al.
Land Use Policy (2019) Vol. 107, pp. 104358-104358
Open Access | Times Cited: 42
Improving the ecological and economic performance of agri-environment schemes: Payment by modelled results versus payment for actions
Katherine Simpson, Paul R. Armsworth, Martin Dallimer, et al.
Land Use Policy (2023) Vol. 130, pp. 106688-106688
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Farmers’ perceptions, preferences, and propositions for result-oriented measures in mountain farming
Alexander Wezel, Audrey Vincent, Heike Nitsch, et al.
Land Use Policy (2017) Vol. 70, pp. 117-127
Closed Access | Times Cited: 34
Using Machine Learning to Identify Heterogeneous Impacts of Agri-Environment Schemes in the EU: A Case Study
Christian Stetter, Philipp Mennig, Johannes Sauer
European Review of Agricultural Economics (2021) Vol. 49, Iss. 4, pp. 723-759
Closed Access | Times Cited: 26
Developing payment-by-results approaches for agri-environment schemes: Experience from an arable trial in England
Stephen Chaplin, Jane Mills, Hannah Chiswell
Land Use Policy (2021) Vol. 109, pp. 105698-105698
Closed Access | Times Cited: 25
A window into land managers’ preferences for new forms of agri-environmental schemes: Evidence from a post-Brexit analysis
Emmanouil Tyllianakis, Julia Martin‐Ortega, Guy Ziv, et al.
Land Use Policy (2023) Vol. 129, pp. 106627-106627
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Beetle bank-positioning on sloped farmland to promote water retention and biodiversity in farm management information systems for agri-environmental schemes
Marvin Melzer, Olivia Spykman, Sonoko Dorothea Bellingrath‐Kimura
Biological Conservation (2025) Vol. 302, pp. 110999-110999
Open Access
The role of self-monitoring in shifting the cultural acceptability of agri-environmental actions
Hannah Chiswell
Journal of Rural Studies (2025) Vol. 115, pp. 103590-103590
Closed Access
Factors affecting farmer participation in agri-environment schemes in the uplands of Northern Ireland
Barry Quinn, Stuart Henderson, Lynsey Hollywood, et al.
Journal of Rural Studies (2025) Vol. 116, pp. 103598-103598
Open Access
Leveraging passive acoustic monitoring for result-based agri-environmental schemes: Opportunities, challenges and next steps
Anna F. Cord, Kevin Darras, Ryo Ogawa, et al.
Biological Conservation (2025) Vol. 305, pp. 111042-111042
Open Access
Drivers and preferences of European farmers for agri-environmental public goods schemes: A two-stage analysis
Emmanouil Tyllianakis, Meike Will, Tomáš Václavík, et al.
Journal for Nature Conservation (2025), pp. 126912-126912
Open Access
Agriculture–Environment Schemes Should Consider Farmers’ Socio-Cultural Background: A Case Study of Estonian Beef Cattle Farmers
Raivo Kalle, Marko Kass, Monika Suškevičs, et al.
Agriculture (2025) Vol. 15, Iss. 7, pp. 741-741
Open Access
Exploring cultural acceptability of a hypothetical results-based agri-environment payment for grassland biodiversity
Traci Birge, Irina Herzon
Journal of Rural Studies (2019) Vol. 67, pp. 1-11
Open Access | Times Cited: 27
Deep learning-based detection of indicator species for monitoring biodiversity in semi-natural grasslands
Deepak Hanike Basavegowda, Inga Schleip, Paul Mosebach, et al.
Environmental Science and Ecotechnology (2024) Vol. 21, pp. 100419-100419
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top