Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

The legitimacy of result-oriented and action-oriented agri-environmental schemes: A comparison of farmers’ and citizens’ perceptions
Annukka Vainio, Annika Tienhaara, Emmi Haltia, et al.
Land Use Policy (2019) Vol. 107, pp. 104358-104358
Open Access | Times Cited: 42

Showing 1-25 of 42 citing articles:

Payments by modelled results: A novel design for agri-environmental schemes
Bartosz Bartkowski, Nils Droste, Mareike Ließ, et al.
Land Use Policy (2020) Vol. 102, pp. 105230-105230
Open Access | Times Cited: 78
Farm typologies for understanding farm systems and improving agricultural policy
Robert Huber, Bartosz Bartkowski, Calum Brown, et al.
Agricultural Systems (2023) Vol. 213, pp. 103800-103800
Open Access | Times Cited: 36
Comparing practice‐ and results‐based agri‐environmental schemes controlled by remote sensing: An application to olive groves in Spain
Anastasio J. Villanueva, Rubén Granado‐Díaz, Sergio Colombo
Journal of Agricultural Economics (2024) Vol. 75, Iss. 2, pp. 524-545
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Farmers’ preferences toward an outcome‐based payment for ecosystem service scheme in Japan
Katsuya Tanaka, Nick Hanley, Laure Kühfuss
Journal of Agricultural Economics (2022) Vol. 73, Iss. 3, pp. 720-738
Open Access | Times Cited: 31
Incentives, Rewards or Both in Payments for Ecosystem Services: Drawing a Link Between Farmers' Preferences and Biodiversity Levels
Carolin Canessa, Terese E. Venus, Miriam Wiesmeier, et al.
Ecological Economics (2023) Vol. 213, pp. 107954-107954
Closed Access | Times Cited: 20
Enhanced LogTODIM-TOPSIS framework for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MAGDM and applications to intangible assets operational management performance evaluation of commercial sporting events
Ke Xu, Kyung-Hwan Choi, Fengshuo Rao
Heliyon (2024) Vol. 10, Iss. 4, pp. e26311-e26311
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Farmers’ heterogeneous preferences towards results-based environmental policies
Olli Niskanen, Annika Tienhaara, Emmi Haltia, et al.
Land Use Policy (2020) Vol. 102, pp. 105227-105227
Closed Access | Times Cited: 47
Perception of ecosystem services and disservices on a peri-urban communal forest: Are landowners’ and visitors’ perspectives dissimilar?
Beatriz Rodríguez-Morales, José V. Roces‐Díaz, Eszter Kelemen, et al.
Ecosystem Services (2020) Vol. 43, pp. 101089-101089
Closed Access | Times Cited: 46
Farmers’ preferences for result-based schemes for grassland conservation in Slovenia
Tanja Šumrada, Anže Japelj, Miroslav Verbič, et al.
Journal for Nature Conservation (2022) Vol. 66, pp. 126143-126143
Open Access | Times Cited: 27
Land manager preferences for outcome-based payments for environmental services in oak savannahs
Rubén Granado‐Díaz, Anastasio J. Villanueva, Sergio Colombo
Ecological Economics (2024) Vol. 220, pp. 108158-108158
Closed Access | Times Cited: 5
Action‐ versus results‐based policy designs for agricultural climate change mitigation
Cordelia Kreft, Robert Finger, Robert Huber
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy (2023) Vol. 46, Iss. 3, pp. 1010-1037
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Agricultural soils in climate change mitigation: comparing action-based and results-based programmes for carbon sequestration
Julia B. Block, Daniel Hermann, Oliver Mußhoff
Climatic Change (2024) Vol. 177, Iss. 8
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Expert views on the legitimacy of renewable hydrogen certification schemes
Daniel Goodwin, Fred Gale, Heather Lovell, et al.
Energy Research & Social Science (2025) Vol. 121, pp. 103970-103970
Open Access
Agonistic pluralism for enhancing the co-design of agri-environmental policy
Charlotte‐Anne Chivers, Lucy Barkley, Christopher Short
AMBIO (2025)
Closed Access
Monitoring environmental and climate goals for European agriculture: User perspectives on the optimization of the Copernicus evolution offer
Emma Schiavon, Andrea Taramelli, Antonella Tornato, et al.
Journal of Environmental Management (2021) Vol. 296, pp. 113121-113121
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
Towards sustainable landscapes: Implementing participatory approaches in contract design for biodiversity preservation and ecosystem services in Europe
Inés Gutiérrez-Briceño, Marina García‐Llorente, Francis Turkelboom, et al.
Environmental Science & Policy (2024) Vol. 160, pp. 103831-103831
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Farmers' attitudes toward the use of digital technologies in the context of agri-environmental policies
Rubén Granado‐Díaz, Sergio Colombo, Marina O. Romero-Varó, et al.
Agricultural Systems (2024) Vol. 221, pp. 104129-104129
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
Are result-based schemes a superior approach to the conservation of High Nature Value grasslands? Evidence from Slovenia
Tanja Šumrada, Branko Vreš, Tatjana Čelik, et al.
Land Use Policy (2021) Vol. 111, pp. 105749-105749
Open Access | Times Cited: 20
Provision of public goods by agriculture and forestry: Economics, policy and the way ahead
Davide Viaggi, Meri Raggi, Anastasio J. Villanueva, et al.
Land Use Policy (2021) Vol. 107, pp. 105273-105273
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Understanding mechanisms that agricultural producers apply in response to evolving social pressures
Jorie Knook, Callum Eastwood, J.B. Pinxterhuis
Journal of Rural Studies (2021) Vol. 89, pp. 306-315
Closed Access | Times Cited: 19
Cost vector effects in discrete choice experiments with positive status quo cost
Heini Ahtiainen, Eija Pouta, W. Zawadzki, et al.
Journal of Choice Modelling (2023) Vol. 47, pp. 100401-100401
Closed Access | Times Cited: 6
Analysis of Agri-Environmental Management Practices and Their Implementation in the Agricultural Policies of the Republic of Serbia
Jelena Vapa–Tankosić, Radivoj Prodanović, Vladimir Medović
Sustainability (2023) Vol. 15, Iss. 16, pp. 12476-12476
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
The Role of Environmental Attitudes and Risk for Adoption with Respect to Farmers’ Participation in the Agri-Environmental Practices
Jelena Vapa–Tankosić, Svetlana Ignjatijević, Nemanja Lekić, et al.
Agriculture (2023) Vol. 13, Iss. 12, pp. 2248-2248
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Comparing the farmland preservation goals of the government and the public from insights of ecosystem services trade-offs: Evidence from Hubei, China
Min Song, Ming-Di Zhu, Han Wang, et al.
Habitat International (2024) Vol. 145, pp. 103014-103014
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
Public preferences and willingness to pay for environmental benefits of straw return: Empirical evidence from Northeast China
Zhenyu Cai, Biqi Mao, Changlin Ao, et al.
Journal of Environmental Management (2024) Vol. 371, pp. 123078-123078
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top