Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Energy and carbon footprints of chicken and pork from intensive production systems in Argentina
Ezequiel M. Arrieta, Alejandro D. González
The Science of The Total Environment (2019) Vol. 673, pp. 20-28
Closed Access | Times Cited: 39

Showing 1-25 of 39 citing articles:

Analysis of the Impact of Livestock Structure on Carbon Emissions of Animal Husbandry: A Sustainable Way to Improving Public Health and Green Environment
Rubiao Shi, Muhammad Irfan, Guangliang Liu, et al.
Frontiers in Public Health (2022) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 89
Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Production: Insights From a Systematic Review
Inês Andretta, Felipe Hickmann, Aline Remus, et al.
Frontiers in Veterinary Science (2021) Vol. 8
Open Access | Times Cited: 82
The Role of Organic Farming in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture in the European Union
Claudiu George Bocean
Agronomy (2025) Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 198-198
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Innovative high digestibility protein feed materials reducing environmental impact through improved nitrogen-use efficiency in sustainable agriculture
Katarzyna Chojnacka, Katarzyna Mikula, Grzegorz Izydorczyk, et al.
Journal of Environmental Management (2021) Vol. 291, pp. 112693-112693
Closed Access | Times Cited: 48
Could the Russia-Ukraine war stir up the persistent memory of interconnectivity among Islamic equity markets, energy commodities, and environmental factors?
حسن حیدری, Sami Ben Jabeur
Research in International Business and Finance (2024) Vol. 69, pp. 102260-102260
Closed Access | Times Cited: 7
Organic Farming as a Strategy to Reduce Carbon Footprint in Dehesa Agroecosystems: A Case Study Comparing Different Livestock Products
Andrés Horrillo, P. Gaspar, M. Escribano
Animals (2020) Vol. 10, Iss. 1, pp. 162-162
Open Access | Times Cited: 49
Environmental burdens of small-scale intensive pig production in China
Xin Liu, Zican Cai, Zengwei Yuan
The Science of The Total Environment (2021) Vol. 770, pp. 144720-144720
Closed Access | Times Cited: 34
A systematic literature review of life cycle assessments on primary pig production: Impacts, comparisons, and mitigation areas
Styrmir Gislason, Morten Birkved, Alberto Maresca
Sustainable Production and Consumption (2023) Vol. 42, pp. 44-62
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
Food and Sustainability: Is It a Matter of Choice?
Éva Polyák, Zita Breitenbach, Eszter Frank, et al.
Sustainability (2023) Vol. 15, Iss. 9, pp. 7191-7191
Open Access | Times Cited: 14
Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China
Huijun Wu, Yongxin Liu, Chengjuan Dai, et al.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2024) Vol. 31, Iss. 14, pp. 21668-21686
Closed Access | Times Cited: 5
A systematic review of life-cycle GHG emissions from intensive pig farming: Accounting and mitigation
Lei Zhang, Yingrong Mao, Zhonghao Chen, et al.
The Science of The Total Environment (2023) Vol. 907, pp. 168112-168112
Closed Access | Times Cited: 13
Quality and environmental footprints of diets by socio-economic status in Argentina
Ezequiel M. Arrieta, Milva Geri, Julia Becaría Coquet, et al.
The Science of The Total Environment (2021) Vol. 801, pp. 149686-149686
Closed Access | Times Cited: 27
Investigating historical dynamics and mitigation scenarios of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from pig production system in China
Xiaowei Chen, Yun Chen, Xingxing Liu, et al.
Journal of Cleaner Production (2021) Vol. 296, pp. 126572-126572
Closed Access | Times Cited: 24
Environmental footprints of meat, milk and egg production in Argentina
Ezequiel M. Arrieta, Sebastián Aguiar, Carlos González Fischer, et al.
Journal of Cleaner Production (2022) Vol. 347, pp. 131325-131325
Closed Access | Times Cited: 17
Carbon footprint analysis for Scope 1 and 2 in meat production – case study of polish plants
Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska, Ewelina Włodarczyk, Łukasz Przybysz
Food and Bioproducts Processing (2025)
Closed Access
Carbon footprint Assessment of Open Snail-Farm Systems in Central and Northern Greece
Marianthi Chatziioannou, Konstantinos Apostolou, C. Domenikiotis
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (2025) Vol. 21, pp. 293-303
Open Access
Life cycle greenhouse gas emission of pork production in China: Carbon inequality embodied in supply chain
Shuru Chen, Kexin Chen, Fan Wu, et al.
Resources Conservation and Recycling (2025) Vol. 220, pp. 108386-108386
Closed Access
Developing an environmental assessment framework for an insect farm operating in circular economy: The case study of a Montréal (Canada) mealworm farm
Nicolas Paris, Alexis Fortin, Noémie Hotte, et al.
Journal of Cleaner Production (2024) Vol. 460, pp. 142450-142450
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
The Reduction of Crude Protein with the Supplementation of Amino Acids in the Diet Reduces the Environmental Impact of Growing Pigs Production Evaluated through Life Cycle Assessment
Lucas Antônio Costa Esteves, Alessandra Monteiro, Natália Yoko Sitanaka, et al.
Sustainability (2021) Vol. 13, Iss. 9, pp. 4815-4815
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
The health, environmental, and economic dimensions of future dietary transitions in Argentina
Ezequiel M. Arrieta, Carlos González Fischer, Sebastián Aguiar, et al.
Sustainability Science (2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Environmental impacts of Australian pork in 2020 and 2022 determined using lifecycle assessments
M. A. Copley, Eugene McGahan, Kevin McCormack, et al.
Animal Production Science (2024) Vol. 64, Iss. 8
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Biomass consumption and environmental footprints of beef cattle production in Argentina
Ezequiel M. Arrieta, Diego Cabrol, Aníbal Cuchietti, et al.
Agricultural Systems (2020) Vol. 185, pp. 102944-102944
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18
Different life cycle assessment methods and causes of variation in estimates of global warming in chicken and pork production systems: A critical systematic review
Jéssica Pereira Silva, Carlo Juliantro Giehl, Kátia Maria Cardinal, et al.
Livestock Science (2023) Vol. 276, pp. 105320-105320
Closed Access | Times Cited: 6
Spatiotemporal variations of water, land, and carbon footprints of pig production in China
Huijun Wu, Xinyue Chen, Ling Zhang, et al.
Environmental Research Letters (2023) Vol. 18, Iss. 11, pp. 114032-114032
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Insights into carbon and nitrogen footprints of large-scale intensive pig production with different feedstuffs in China
Huijun Wu, Yongxin Liu, Ling Zhang, et al.
Resources Environment and Sustainability (2024), pp. 100181-100181
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top