Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

THE ROYAL SOCIETY AND THE PREHISTORY OF PEER REVIEW, 1665–1965
Noah Moxham, Aileen Fyfe
The Historical Journal (2017) Vol. 61, Iss. 4, pp. 863-889
Open Access | Times Cited: 93

Showing 1-25 of 93 citing articles:

The limitations to our understanding of peer review
Jonathan Tennant, Tony Ross‐Hellauer
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2020) Vol. 5, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 238
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
Jonathan Tennant, Jonathan M. Dugan, Daniel Graziotin, et al.
F1000Research (2017) Vol. 6, pp. 1151-1151
Open Access | Times Cited: 207
The changing forms and expectations of peer review
Serge P. J. M. Horbach, W. Halffman
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2018) Vol. 3, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 140
The state of the art in peer review
Jonathan Tennant
FEMS Microbiology Letters (2018) Vol. 365, Iss. 19
Open Access | Times Cited: 131
Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing
Jonathan Tennant, Harry Crane, Tom Crick, et al.
Publications (2019) Vol. 7, Iss. 2, pp. 34-34
Open Access | Times Cited: 122
No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic
Serge P. J. M. Horbach
Research Evaluation (2020) Vol. 30, Iss. 3, pp. 231-239
Open Access | Times Cited: 72
Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science
Michele Avissar-Whiting, Frédérique Belliard, Stefano Bertozzi, et al.
PLoS Biology (2024) Vol. 22, Iss. 2, pp. e3002502-e3002502
Open Access | Times Cited: 13
Scientific Progress
Darrell P. Rowbottom
(2023)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 19
Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research

Open Book Publishers (2019)
Open Access | Times Cited: 48
The “invisible hand” of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal
Pierpaolo Dondio, Niccolò Casnici, Francisco Grimaldo, et al.
Journal of Informetrics (2019) Vol. 13, Iss. 2, pp. 708-716
Open Access | Times Cited: 44
Open Science in the Humanities, or: Open Humanities?
Marcel Knöchelmann
Publications (2019) Vol. 7, Iss. 4, pp. 65-65
Open Access | Times Cited: 44
Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant?
Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Willem Halffman
Minerva (2019) Vol. 58, Iss. 2, pp. 139-161
Closed Access | Times Cited: 39
Scientific Grant Funding
Pierre Azoulay, Danielle Li
(2020)
Open Access | Times Cited: 38
Science and Reading in the Eighteenth Century
Markman Ellis
(2023)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 13
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
Jonathan Tennant, Jonathan M. Dugan, Daniel Graziotin, et al.
F1000Research (2017) Vol. 6, pp. 1151-1151
Open Access | Times Cited: 38
Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals, 1865-1965
Aileen Fyfe, Flaminio Squazzoni, Didier Torny, et al.
Science Technology & Human Values (2019) Vol. 45, Iss. 3, pp. 405-429
Open Access | Times Cited: 32
Towards theorizing peer review
Sven E. Hug
Quantitative Science Studies (2022) Vol. 3, Iss. 3, pp. 815-831
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
Why I value peer review
Patricia L. Lockwood
Nature Human Behaviour (2025)
Closed Access
Peer review in Chinese national journals: historical development and challenges
Ping Wang, Hugo Horta
Higher Education (2025)
Open Access
Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of scientist behavior under open peer review
Federico Bianchi, Flaminio Squazzoni
Science and Public Policy (2022) Vol. 49, Iss. 5, pp. 791-800
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Introduction: Editorship and the editing of scientific journals, 1750–1950
Aileen Fyfe, Anna Gielas
Centaurus (2020) Vol. 62, Iss. 1, pp. 5-20
Open Access | Times Cited: 22
Scholarly Review, Old and New
Mark Hooper
Journal of Scholarly Publishing (2019) Vol. 51, Iss. 1, pp. 63-75
Open Access | Times Cited: 20
A perspective from the history of scientific journals.
Melinda Baldwin
History of Psychology (2018) Vol. 21, Iss. 4, pp. 363-368
Closed Access | Times Cited: 17
5. Violins in the Subway
Martin Paul Eve
Open Book Publishers (2020), pp. 105-122
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Preprint Servers’ Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations
Mario Malički, Ana Jerončić, L.M. Bouter, et al.
Research Square (Research Square) (2021)
Open Access | Times Cited: 14
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top