Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Are good reasoners more incest-friendly? Trait cognitive reflection predicts selective moralization in a sample of American adults
Edward B. Royzman, Justin F. Landy, Geoffrey P. Goodwin
Judgment and Decision Making (2014) Vol. 9, Iss. 3, pp. 176-190
Open Access | Times Cited: 66

Showing 1-25 of 66 citing articles:

Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking
Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand
Journal of Personality (2019) Vol. 88, Iss. 2, pp. 185-200
Open Access | Times Cited: 683
What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement
Gordon Pennycook, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Derek J. Koehler
Cognitive Psychology (2015) Vol. 80, pp. 34-72
Open Access | Times Cited: 444
Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking
Gordon Pennycook, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Derek J. Koehler
Current Directions in Psychological Science (2015) Vol. 24, Iss. 6, pp. 425-432
Open Access | Times Cited: 327
Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?
Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Derek J. Koehler, et al.
Behavior Research Methods (2015) Vol. 48, Iss. 1, pp. 341-348
Open Access | Times Cited: 229
Atheists and Agnostics Are More Reflective than Religious Believers: Four Empirical Studies and a Meta-Analysis
Gordon Pennycook, Robert M. Ross, Derek J. Koehler, et al.
PLoS ONE (2016) Vol. 11, Iss. 4, pp. e0153039-e0153039
Open Access | Times Cited: 229
Cognitive reflection correlates with behavior on Twitter
Mohsen Mosleh, Gordon Pennycook, Antonio A. Arechar, et al.
Nature Communications (2021) Vol. 12, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 139
Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology
Kristen D. Deppe, Frank J. Gonzalez, Jayme L. Neiman, et al.
Judgment and Decision Making (2015) Vol. 10, Iss. 4, pp. 314-331
Open Access | Times Cited: 140
Cognitive reflection test: Whom, how, when
Pablo Brañas–Garza, Praveen Kujal, Balint Lenkei
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (2019) Vol. 82, pp. 101455-101455
Open Access | Times Cited: 109
On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs
Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Derek J. Koehler, et al.
Judgment and Decision Making (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 4, pp. 476-498
Open Access | Times Cited: 109
Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2018) Vol. 45, Iss. 2, pp. 224-239
Open Access | Times Cited: 96
A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyond
Gordon Pennycook
Advances in experimental social psychology (2022), pp. 131-208
Open Access | Times Cited: 44
Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making
Gordon Pennycook, Robert M. Ross
Frontiers in Psychology (2016) Vol. 7
Open Access | Times Cited: 85
Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies
Nick Byrd, Paul Conway
Cognition (2019) Vol. 192, pp. 103995-103995
Open Access | Times Cited: 66
The what, how, and why of moralization: A review of current definitions, methods, and evidence in moralization research
Joshua J. Rhee, Chelsea Schein, Brock Bastian
Social and Personality Psychology Compass (2019) Vol. 13, Iss. 12
Closed Access | Times Cited: 65
The relation between different types of religiosity and analytic cognitive style
Hasan G. Bahçekapılı, Onurcan Yılmaz
Personality and Individual Differences (2017) Vol. 117, pp. 267-272
Closed Access | Times Cited: 64
Evaluating the cognitive reflection test as a measure of intuition/reflection, numeracy, and insight problem solving, and the implications for understanding real-world judgments and beliefs.
Niraj Patel, Stephanie Baker, Laura D. Scherer
Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2019) Vol. 148, Iss. 12, pp. 2129-2153
Closed Access | Times Cited: 60
Social metacognition in moral judgment: Decisional conflict promotes perspective taking.
André Mata
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2019) Vol. 117, Iss. 6, pp. 1061-1082
Closed Access | Times Cited: 56
Reflective minds and open hearts: Cognitive style and personality predict religiosity and spiritual thinking in a community sample
Matthew Browne, Gordon Pennycook, Belinda C. Goodwin, et al.
European Journal of Social Psychology (2014) Vol. 44, Iss. 7, pp. 736-742
Closed Access | Times Cited: 61
Activating analytic thinking enhances the value given to individualizing moral foundations
Onurcan Yılmaz, S. Adil Sarıbay
Cognition (2017) Vol. 165, pp. 88-96
Closed Access | Times Cited: 55
Eager feelings and vigilant reasons: Regulatory focus differences in judging moral wrongs.
James F. M. Cornwell, E. Tory Higgins
Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2016) Vol. 145, Iss. 3, pp. 338-355
Open Access | Times Cited: 45
Representations of moral violations: Category members and associated features
Justin F. Landy
Judgment and Decision Making (2016) Vol. 11, Iss. 5, pp. 496-508
Open Access | Times Cited: 39
A reflection on cognitive reflection – testing convergent/divergent validity of two measures of cognitive reflection
Nikola Erceg, Zvonimir Galić, Mitja Ružojčić
Judgment and Decision Making (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 5, pp. 741-755
Open Access | Times Cited: 34
The puzzle of wrongless harms: Some potential concerns for dyadic morality and related accounts
Edward B. Royzman, Samuel H. Borislow
Cognition (2022) Vol. 220, pp. 104980-104980
Closed Access | Times Cited: 22
The “Ought” Premise of Moral Psychology and the Importance of the Ethical “Ideal”
James F. M. Cornwell, E. Tory Higgins
Review of General Psychology (2015) Vol. 19, Iss. 3, pp. 311-328
Closed Access | Times Cited: 37
Individual differences in reliance on intuition predict harsher moral judgments.
Sarah Ward, Laura A. King
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2017) Vol. 114, Iss. 5, pp. 825-849
Closed Access | Times Cited: 35
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top