OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Psychological and sociomoral reasoning in infancy.
Renée Baillargeon, Rose M. Scott, Zijing He, et al.
American Psychological Association eBooks (2014), pp. 79-150
Open Access | Times Cited: 94

Showing 1-25 of 94 citing articles:

Early False-Belief Understanding
Rose M. Scott, Renée Baillargeon
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2017) Vol. 21, Iss. 4, pp. 237-249
Open Access | Times Cited: 378

Psychological Reasoning in Infancy
Renée Baillargeon, Rose M. Scott, Lin Bian
Annual Review of Psychology (2015) Vol. 67, Iss. 1, pp. 159-186
Open Access | Times Cited: 236

Infants possess an abstract expectation of ingroup support
Kyong‐sun Jin, Renée Baillargeon
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2017) Vol. 114, Iss. 31, pp. 8199-8204
Open Access | Times Cited: 217

Precursors to morality in development as a complex interplay between neural, socioenvironmental, and behavioral facets
Jason M. Cowell, Jean Decety
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2015) Vol. 112, Iss. 41, pp. 12657-12662
Open Access | Times Cited: 205

Infants’ evaluation of prosocial and antisocial agents: A meta-analysis.
Francesco Margoni, Luca Surian
Developmental Psychology (2018) Vol. 54, Iss. 8, pp. 1445-1455
Open Access | Times Cited: 196

Is Implicit Theory of Mind a Real and Robust Phenomenon? Results From a Systematic Replication Study
Louisa Kulke, Britta von Duhn, Dana Schneider, et al.
Psychological Science (2018) Vol. 29, Iss. 6, pp. 888-900
Closed Access | Times Cited: 163

Infants’ preferences for native speakers are associated with an expectation of information
Katarina Begus, Teodora Gliga, Victoria Southgate
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2016) Vol. 113, Iss. 44, pp. 12397-12402
Open Access | Times Cited: 168

Infants expect ingroup support to override fairness when resources are limited
Lin Bian, Stephanie Sloane, Renée Baillargeon
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2018) Vol. 115, Iss. 11, pp. 2705-2710
Open Access | Times Cited: 162

Do Infants in the First Year of Life Expect Equal Resource Allocations?
Melody Buyukozer Dawkins, Stephanie Sloane, Renée Baillargeon
Frontiers in Psychology (2019) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 144

How robust are anticipatory looking measures of Theory of Mind? Replication attempts across the life span
Louisa Kulke, Mirjam Reiß, Horst Krist, et al.
Cognitive Development (2017) Vol. 46, pp. 97-111
Closed Access | Times Cited: 120

Infants understand deceptive intentions to implant false beliefs about identity: New evidence for early mentalistic reasoning
Rose M. Scott, Joshua C. Richman, Renée Baillargeon
Cognitive Psychology (2015) Vol. 82, pp. 32-56
Open Access | Times Cited: 112

The Moral brain: a multidisciplinary perspective

Choice Reviews Online (2015) Vol. 53, Iss. 02, pp. 53-1047
Closed Access | Times Cited: 111

Infants Associate Praise and Admonishment with Fair and Unfair Individuals
Trent D. DesChamps, Arianne E. Eason, Jessica A. Sommerville
Infancy (2015) Vol. 21, Iss. 4, pp. 478-504
Open Access | Times Cited: 97

Probing the depth of infants’ theory of mind: disunity in performance across paradigms
Diane Poulin‐Dubois, Jessica Yott
Developmental Science (2017) Vol. 21, Iss. 4
Open Access | Times Cited: 97

Infants recruit logic to learn about the social world
Nicolò Cesana-Arlotti, Ágnes Melinda Kovács, Ernő Téglás
Nature Communications (2020) Vol. 11, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 83

Why can some implicit Theory of Mind tasks be replicated and others cannot? A test of mentalizing versus submentalizing accounts
Louisa Kulke, Josefin Johannsen, Hannes Rakoczy
PLoS ONE (2019) Vol. 14, Iss. 3, pp. e0213772-e0213772
Open Access | Times Cited: 77

Pragmatic development explains the Theory-of-Mind Scale
Evan Westra, Peter Carruthers
Cognition (2016) Vol. 158, pp. 165-176
Closed Access | Times Cited: 82

Infants distinguish between leaders and bullies
Francesco Margoni, Renée Baillargeon, Luca Surian
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2018) Vol. 115, Iss. 38
Open Access | Times Cited: 80

The Development of Infants’ Sensitivity to Behavioral Intentions when Inferring Others’ Social Preferences
Young‐Eun Lee, Jung-eun Ellie Yun, Eun Young Kim, et al.
PLoS ONE (2015) Vol. 10, Iss. 9, pp. e0135588-e0135588
Open Access | Times Cited: 75

Listen up! Speech is for thinking during infancy
Athena Vouloumanos, Sandra R. Waxman
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2014) Vol. 18, Iss. 12, pp. 642-646
Open Access | Times Cited: 74

Infants’ representations of others’ goals: Representing approach over avoidance
Roman Feiman, Susan Carey, Fiery Cushman
Cognition (2014) Vol. 136, pp. 204-214
Open Access | Times Cited: 73

Not So Innocent
Julian Jara‐Ettinger, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Laura Schulz
Psychological Science (2015) Vol. 26, Iss. 5, pp. 633-640
Closed Access | Times Cited: 70

Explaining the U-Shaped Development of Intent-Based Moral Judgments
Francesco Margoni, Luca Surian
Frontiers in Psychology (2016) Vol. 7
Open Access | Times Cited: 66

The Developmental Origins of False-Belief Understanding
Rose M. Scott
Current Directions in Psychological Science (2017) Vol. 26, Iss. 1, pp. 68-74
Open Access | Times Cited: 62

Do Infants Really Expect Agents to Act Efficiently? A Critical Test of the Rationality Principle
Rose M. Scott, Renée Baillargeon
Psychological Science (2013) Vol. 24, Iss. 4, pp. 466-474
Open Access | Times Cited: 67

Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top