Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

The science of sharing and the sharing of science
Katherine L. Milkman, Jonah Berger
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2014) Vol. 111, Iss. supplement_4, pp. 13642-13649
Open Access | Times Cited: 138

Showing 1-25 of 138 citing articles:

Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news
Dietram A. Scheufele, Nicole M. Krause
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2019) Vol. 116, Iss. 16, pp. 7662-7669
Open Access | Times Cited: 710
Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media
Steve Rathje, Jay Joseph Van Bavel, Sander van der Linden
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2021) Vol. 118, Iss. 26
Open Access | Times Cited: 388
Getting the Word Out: New Approaches for Disseminating Public Health Science
Ross C. Brownson, Amy A. Eyler, Jenine K. Harris, et al.
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (2017) Vol. 24, Iss. 2, pp. 102-111
Open Access | Times Cited: 338
Believing and sharing misinformation, fact-checks, and accurate information on social media: The role of anxiety during COVID-19
Isabelle Freiling, Nicole M. Krause, Dietram A. Scheufele, et al.
New Media & Society (2021) Vol. 25, Iss. 1, pp. 141-162
Open Access | Times Cited: 168
What Is Dissemination and Implementation Science?: An Introduction and Opportunities to Advance Behavioral Medicine and Public Health Globally
Rachel C. Shelton, Matthew Lee, Laura Brotzman, et al.
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (2020) Vol. 27, Iss. 1, pp. 3-20
Closed Access | Times Cited: 86
The fingerprints of misinformation: how deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions
Carlos Carrasco
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2022) Vol. 9, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 57
People Think That Social Media Platforms Do (but Should Not) Amplify Divisive Content
Steve Rathje, Claire Robertson, William J. Brady, et al.
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2023) Vol. 19, Iss. 5, pp. 781-795
Open Access | Times Cited: 29
How can we make sound replication decisions?
Clintin P. Davis‐Stober, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Balázs Aczél, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2025) Vol. 122, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Tweet success? Scientific communication correlates with increased citations in Ecology and Conservation
Clayton T. Lamb, Sophie L. Gilbert, Adam T. Ford
PeerJ (2018) Vol. 6, pp. e4564-e4564
Open Access | Times Cited: 66
Laypeople Can Predict Which Social-Science Studies Will Be Replicated Successfully
Suzanne Hoogeveen, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Eric–Jan Wagenmakers
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (2020) Vol. 3, Iss. 3, pp. 267-285
Open Access | Times Cited: 66
Facial appearance affects science communication
Ana I. Gheorghiu, Mitchell J. Callan, William J. Skylark
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2017) Vol. 114, Iss. 23, pp. 5970-5975
Open Access | Times Cited: 65
The differential effects of trusting beliefs on social media users’ willingness to adopt and share health knowledge
Xiaoling Jin, Mengjie Yin, Zhongyun Zhou, et al.
Information Processing & Management (2020) Vol. 58, Iss. 1, pp. 102413-102413
Closed Access | Times Cited: 61
The New ABCs of Research
Ben Shneiderman
Oxford University Press eBooks (2016)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 61
Dissemination Strategies to Accelerate the Policy Impact of Children’s Mental Health Services Research
Jonathan Purtle, Katherine Nelson, Eric J. Bruns, et al.
Psychiatric Services (2020) Vol. 71, Iss. 11, pp. 1170-1178
Open Access | Times Cited: 55
Social Debunking of Misinformation on WhatsApp: The Case for Strong and In-group Ties
Irene V. Pasquetto, Eaman Jahani, Shubham Atreja, et al.
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2022) Vol. 6, Iss. CSCW1, pp. 1-35
Open Access | Times Cited: 35
Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers
Hao Peng, Daniel M. Romero, Emőke-Ágnes Horvát
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2022) Vol. 119, Iss. 25
Open Access | Times Cited: 31
How New Ideas Diffuse in Science
Mengjie Cheng, Daniel Scott Smith, Xiang Ren, et al.
American Sociological Review (2023) Vol. 88, Iss. 3, pp. 522-561
Closed Access | Times Cited: 19
The Science of Science Communication II
Baruch Fischhoff, Dietram A. Scheufele
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2014) Vol. 111, Iss. supplement_4, pp. 13583-13584
Open Access | Times Cited: 66
The impact of content sentiment and emotionality on content virality
Irina Heimbach, Oliver Hinz
International Journal of Research in Marketing (2016) Vol. 33, Iss. 3, pp. 695-701
Closed Access | Times Cited: 58
Microblogging as an extension of science reporting
Moritz Büchi
Public Understanding of Science (2016) Vol. 26, Iss. 8, pp. 953-968
Open Access | Times Cited: 49
An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science
Noriko Hara, Jessica Abbazio, Kathryn Perkins
PLoS ONE (2019) Vol. 14, Iss. 5, pp. e0216789-e0216789
Open Access | Times Cited: 47
The decision‐making process in viral marketing—A review and suggestions for further research
Thomas Reichstein, Ines Brusch
Psychology and Marketing (2019) Vol. 36, Iss. 11, pp. 1062-1081
Closed Access | Times Cited: 44
Social Media and the Changing Information Environment
Patrick Kraft, Yanna Krupnikov, Kerri Milita, et al.
Public Opinion Quarterly (2020) Vol. 84, Iss. S1, pp. 195-215
Open Access | Times Cited: 42
The Sci-Hub effect on papers’ citations
Juan C. Correa, Henry Laverde-Rojas, Julián Tejada, et al.
Scientometrics (2021) Vol. 127, Iss. 1, pp. 99-126
Closed Access | Times Cited: 38
Negative expressions are shared more on Twitter for public figures than for ordinary users
Jonas Schöne, David García, Brian Parkinson, et al.
PNAS Nexus (2023) Vol. 2, Iss. 7
Open Access | Times Cited: 14
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top