Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Showing 22 citing articles:

Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations
Kathryn Oliver, Annette Boaz
Palgrave Communications (2019) Vol. 5, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 109
The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature
Nienke de Graeff, Karin Jongsma, Josephine Johnston, et al.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (2019) Vol. 374, Iss. 1772
Open Access | Times Cited: 73
Against the tide of depoliticisation: the politics of research governance
Sarah Hartley, Warren Pearce, Alasdair Taylor
Policy & Politics (2016) Vol. 45, Iss. 3, pp. 361-377
Open Access | Times Cited: 58
Essential Features of Responsible Governance of Agricultural Biotechnology
Sarah Hartley, Frøydis Gillund, Lilian van Hove, et al.
PLoS Biology (2016) Vol. 14, Iss. 5, pp. e1002453-e1002453
Open Access | Times Cited: 57
NGO perspectives on the social and ethical dimensions of plant genome-editing
Richard Helliwell, Sarah Hartley, Warren Pearce
Agriculture and Human Values (2019) Vol. 36, Iss. 4, pp. 779-791
Open Access | Times Cited: 45
Opening Pandora’s Box? Joint Sovereignty and the Rise of EU Agencies with Operational Tasks
Christian Freudlsperger, Adina Akbik, Marta Migliorati
Comparative Political Studies (2022) Vol. 55, Iss. 12, pp. 1983-2014
Open Access | Times Cited: 24
Science and the politics of openness : Here be monsters
Sarah Hartley, Sujatha Raman, Alexander Thomas T. Smith, et al.
Manchester University Press eBooks (2018)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 44
Responsible Innovation and political accountability: genetically modified mosquitoes in Brazil
André Sica de Campos, Sarah Hartley, Christiaan de Koning, et al.
Journal of Responsible Innovation (2017) Vol. 4, Iss. 1, pp. 5-23
Open Access | Times Cited: 42
Revisiting the Base in Evidence-Based Policy
Mike D. Schneider, Helena Slanickova, Hannah Rubin, et al.
Political Studies (2025)
Closed Access
International perspectives on the meaning of engagement in biotechnology risk assessment: the case of gene drive
Sarah Hartley, Aleksandra Stelmach, Adam Kokotovich, et al.
Journal of Risk Research (2025), pp. 1-15
Open Access
With great power comes great responsibility: why ‘safe enough’ is not good enough in debates on new gene technologies
Sigfrid Kjeldaas, Tim Dassler, Trine Antonsen, et al.
Agriculture and Human Values (2022) Vol. 40, Iss. 2, pp. 533-545
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
Engagement on risk assessment for gene drive mosquitoes by EFSA and Target Malaria
Sarah Hartley, Adam Kokotovich, Yann Devos, et al.
Environmental Science & Policy (2023) Vol. 142, pp. 183-193
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Public Consultation on Proposed Revisions to Norway’s Gene Technology Act: An Analysis of the Consultation Framing, Stakeholder Concerns, and the Integration of Non-Safety Considerations
Sigfrid Kjeldaas, Trine Antonsen, Sarah Hartley, et al.
Sustainability (2021) Vol. 13, Iss. 14, pp. 7643-7643
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Prescribing engagement in environmental risk assessment for gene drive technology
Sarah Hartley, Adam Kokotovich, Caroline McCalman
Regulation & Governance (2022) Vol. 17, Iss. 2, pp. 411-424
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Relying on agencies in major European Union legislative measures
Marta Migliorati
West European Politics (2019) Vol. 43, Iss. 1, pp. 159-180
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Expertise, politics and public opinion at the crossroads of the European Commission’s decision-making: The case of Glyphosate.
Giulia Bazzan, Marta Migliorati
International Review of Public Policy (2020) Vol. 2, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Anti-transparency within the EU shift to open science
Gustaf Nelhans, Jan Nolin
Science and Public Policy (2022) Vol. 49, Iss. 6, pp. 928-941
Closed Access | Times Cited: 4
Making space for CRISPR: scientists’ translation work to make gene editing a legitimate technology
Marit Svingen, Lisbeth Jahren
Science and Public Policy (2023) Vol. 51, Iss. 1, pp. 15-27
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
An Agenda for Responsible Research and Innovation in ERA CoBioTech
R. Smith, D.B. Scott, Zara Thokozani Kamwendo, et al.
(2019)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
Unlocking participation
Daniela Fuchs
(2024)
Open Access
Gene drive technologies: navigating the ethical landscape
Nienke de Graeff
(2022)
Open Access
Genome edited animals
Jonathan Wentworth, David Rapley
(2022)
Open Access
Page 1

Scroll to top