Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Analytic-thinking predicts hoax beliefs and helping behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Matthew L. Stanley, Nathaniel Barr, Kelly Peters, et al.
Thinking & Reasoning (2020) Vol. 27, Iss. 3, pp. 464-477
Open Access | Times Cited: 80

Showing 1-25 of 80 citing articles:

The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction
Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Stephan Lewandowsky, John Cook, et al.
Nature Reviews Psychology (2022) Vol. 1, Iss. 1, pp. 13-29
Open Access | Times Cited: 805
Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: A systematic review
Valerie van Mulukom, Lotte Pummerer, Sinan Alper, et al.
Social Science & Medicine (2022) Vol. 301, pp. 114912-114912
Open Access | Times Cited: 272
Psychological correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and preventive measures: Evidence from Turkey
Sinan Alper, Fatih Bayrak, Onurcan Yılmaz
Current Psychology (2020) Vol. 40, Iss. 11, pp. 5708-5717
Open Access | Times Cited: 170
Fighting fake news in the COVID-19 era: policy insights from an equilibrium model
Kris Hartley, Minh Khuong Vu
Policy Sciences (2020) Vol. 53, Iss. 4, pp. 735-758
Open Access | Times Cited: 145
Boredom in the COVID-19 pandemic: Trait boredom proneness, the desire to act, and rule-breaking
James Boylan, Paul Seli, Abigail A. Scholer, et al.
Personality and Individual Differences (2020) Vol. 171, pp. 110387-110387
Open Access | Times Cited: 120
Understanding misinformation infodemic during public health emergencies due to large-scale disease outbreaks: a rapid review
Nashit Chowdhury, Ayisha Khalid, Tanvir Chowdhury Turin
Journal of Public Health (2021) Vol. 31, Iss. 4, pp. 553-573
Open Access | Times Cited: 66
Individual, intergroup and nation-level influences on belief in conspiracy theories
Matthew J. Hornsey, Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Kai Sassenberg, et al.
Nature Reviews Psychology (2022) Vol. 2, Iss. 2, pp. 85-97
Open Access | Times Cited: 61
The usual suspects: How psychological motives and thinking styles predict the endorsement of well‐known and COVID‐19 conspiracy beliefs
Vukašin Gligorić, Margarida Moreira da Silva, Selin Eker, et al.
Applied Cognitive Psychology (2021) Vol. 35, Iss. 5, pp. 1171-1181
Open Access | Times Cited: 58
A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyond
Gordon Pennycook
Advances in experimental social psychology (2022), pp. 131-208
Open Access | Times Cited: 43
Acquiescence Bias Inflates Estimates of Conspiratorial Beliefs and Political Misperceptions
Seth J. Hill, Margaret E. Roberts
Political Analysis (2023) Vol. 31, Iss. 4, pp. 575-590
Open Access | Times Cited: 32
Socially optimal mistakes? debiasing COVID-19 mortality risk perceptions and prosocial behavior
Martin Abel, Tanya Byker, Jeffrey P. Carpenter
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2021) Vol. 183, pp. 456-480
Open Access | Times Cited: 52
Geospatial analysis of misinformation in COVID-19 related tweets
Amir Masoud Forati, Rina Ghose
Applied Geography (2021) Vol. 133, pp. 102473-102473
Open Access | Times Cited: 42
Analytic thinking predicts accuracy ratings and willingness to share COVID-19 misinformation in Australia
Matthew S. Nurse, Robert M. Ross, Ozan İşler, et al.
Memory & Cognition (2021) Vol. 50, Iss. 2, pp. 425-434
Open Access | Times Cited: 42
Measuring the effects of misinformation exposure and beliefs on behavioural intentions: a COVID-19 vaccination study
Constance de Saint Laurent, Gillian Murphy, Karen Hegarty, et al.
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications (2022) Vol. 7, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 32
Aggressive measures, rising inequalities, and mass formation during the COVID-19 crisis: An overview and proposed way forward
Michaéla C. Schippers, John P. A. Ioannidis, Ari R. Joffe
Frontiers in Public Health (2022) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 30
Pairing facts with imagined consequences improves pandemic-related risk perception
Alyssa H. Sinclair, Shabnam Hakimi, Matthew L. Stanley, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2021) Vol. 118, Iss. 32
Open Access | Times Cited: 40
Don't believe it! A global perspective on cognitive reflection and conspiracy theories about COVID-19 pandemic
Elena Kantorowicz‐Reznichenko, Chris Reinders Folmer, Jarosław Kantorowicz
Personality and Individual Differences (2022) Vol. 194, pp. 111666-111666
Open Access | Times Cited: 26
Your health vs. my liberty: Philosophical beliefs dominated reflection and identifiable victim effects when predicting public health recommendation compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic
Nick Byrd, Michał Białek
Cognition (2021) Vol. 212, pp. 104649-104649
Open Access | Times Cited: 32
Distributed model for customer churn prediction using convolutional neural network
Muhammad Usman Tariq, Muhammad Ali Babar, Marc Poulin, et al.
Journal of Modelling in Management (2021) Vol. 17, Iss. 3, pp. 853-863
Closed Access | Times Cited: 30
Rational thinking style, rejection of coronavirus (COVID-19) conspiracy theories/theorists, and compliance with mandated requirements
Viren Swami, David Barron
Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology (2021) Vol. 15
Open Access | Times Cited: 30
Both a bioweapon and a hoax: the curious case of contradictory conspiracy theories about COVID-19
Marija Petrović, Iris Žeželj
Thinking & Reasoning (2022) Vol. 29, Iss. 4, pp. 456-487
Open Access | Times Cited: 21
Scientific reasoning is associated with rejection of unfounded health beliefs and adherence to evidence-based regulations during the Covid-19 pandemic
Vladimíra Čavojová, Jakub Šrol, Eva Ballová Mikušková
Current Psychology (2023) Vol. 43, Iss. 9, pp. 8288-8302
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Of tinfoil hats and thinking caps: Reasoning is more strongly related to implausible than plausible conspiracy beliefs
Michael Hattersley, Gordon D. A. Brown, John Michael, et al.
Cognition (2021) Vol. 218, pp. 104956-104956
Open Access | Times Cited: 26
The effect of thinking styles on belief in conspiracy theories in the context of Covid-19
Lemi Baruh, Batuhan Ustaoğlu, Zeynep Cemalcılar, et al.
SN Social Sciences (2025) Vol. 5, Iss. 2
Closed Access
I See the Problem, Why Don’t You? Examining Problem Irrecognition through the Context of COVID-19
Lan Ni, Ye Dai, Miao Pan
Journal of Public Relations Research (2025), pp. 1-22
Closed Access
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top