Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Is Peer Review a Good Idea?
Remco Heesen, Liam Kofi Bright
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2019) Vol. 72, Iss. 3, pp. 635-663
Open Access | Times Cited: 98

Showing 1-25 of 98 citing articles:

Philosophy of Open Science
Sabina Leonelli
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 60
The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence
Balázs Aczél, Ann‐Sophie Barwich, Amanda B. Diekman, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2025) Vol. 122, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Scientific conclusions need not be accurate, justified, or believed by their authors
Haixin Dang, Liam Kofi Bright
Synthese (2021) Vol. 199, Iss. 3-4, pp. 8187-8203
Open Access | Times Cited: 62
What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis
Alejandra Recio‐Saucedo, Ksenia Crane, Katie Meadmore, et al.
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2022) Vol. 7, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 40
How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought
Ludo Waltman, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Stephen Pinfield, et al.
Learned Publishing (2023) Vol. 36, Iss. 3, pp. 334-347
Open Access | Times Cited: 39
Caution, Preprint! Brief Explanations Allow Nonscientists to Differentiate Between Preprints and Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles
Tobias Wingen, Jana Berkessel, Simone Dohle
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (2022) Vol. 5, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 32
It Takes a Village to Trust Science: Towards a (Thoroughly) Social Approach to Public Trust in Science
Gabriele Contessa
Erkenntnis (2022) Vol. 88, Iss. 7, pp. 2941-2966
Open Access | Times Cited: 27
Post-publication Peer Review with an Intention to Uncover Data/Result Irregularities and Potential Research Misconduct in Scientific Research: Vigilantism or Volunteerism?
Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh, Bor Luen Tang
Science and Engineering Ethics (2023) Vol. 29, Iss. 4
Closed Access | Times Cited: 16
Philosophy, Bullshit, and Peer Review
Neil Levy
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 14
Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research
Jesper W. Schneider, Nick Allum, Jens Peter Andersen, et al.
PLoS ONE (2024) Vol. 19, Iss. 8, pp. e0304342-e0304342
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Modelling Scientific Communities
Cailin O’Connor
(2023)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 12
Political Bias in the Social Sciences: A Critical, Theoretical, and Empirical Review
Nathan Honeycutt, Lee Jussim
Springer eBooks (2023), pp. 97-146
Closed Access | Times Cited: 10
Citation Metrics: A Philosophy of Science Perspective
Chiara Lisciandra
Episteme (2025), pp. 1-15
Closed Access
Crowd-sourced peer review: wisdom or tyranny of the crowd?
Seán Mfundza Muller
South African Journal of Philosophy (2025), pp. 1-12
Open Access
Critical Contextual Empiricism for Busy People: Scientific Argumentation as Epistemic Exchange
Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Çağlar Dede
Topoi (2025)
Open Access
Misspecification and unreliable interpretations in psychology and social science.
Matthew J. Vowels
Psychological Methods (2021) Vol. 28, Iss. 3, pp. 507-526
Open Access | Times Cited: 22
In Trust We Trust: Epistemic Vigilance and Responsibility
Neil Levy
Social Epistemology (2022) Vol. 36, Iss. 3, pp. 283-298
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
Incentives for Research Effort: An Evolutionary Model of Publication Markets with Double-Blind and Open Review
Mantas Radžvilas, Francesco De Pretis, William Peden, et al.
Computational Economics (2022) Vol. 61, Iss. 4, pp. 1433-1476
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research.
Jesper W. Schneider, Nick Allum, Jens Peter Andersen, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
There is no easy fix to peer review but paying referees and regulating the number of submissions might help
Mohamed L. Seghier
F1000Research (2024) Vol. 13, pp. 439-439
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Gatekeeping should be conserved in the open science era
Hugh Desmond
Synthese (2024) Vol. 203, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Structural causes of citation gaps
Hannah Rubin
Philosophical Studies (2022) Vol. 179, Iss. 7, pp. 2323-2345
Closed Access | Times Cited: 13
Problems with Peer Review Shine a Light on Gaps in Scientific Training
Diana M. Proctor, Nsa Dada, Anna Serquiña, et al.
mBio (2023) Vol. 14, Iss. 3
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Metascience on Peer Review: Testing the Effects of a Study’s Originality and Statistical Significance in a Field Experiment
Malte Elson, Markus Huff, Sonja Utz
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (2020) Vol. 3, Iss. 1, pp. 53-65
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Examining uncertainty in journal peer reviewers’ recommendations: a cross-sectional study
Adrian Barnett, Liz Allen, Adrian Aldcroft, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2024) Vol. 11, Iss. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top