Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Innovating peer review, reconfiguring scholarly communication: an analytical overview of ongoing peer review innovation activities
Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman, et al.
Journal of Documentation (2022) Vol. 78, Iss. 7, pp. 429-449
Open Access | Times Cited: 24

Showing 24 citing articles:

ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing
Brady Lund, Ting Wang, Nishith Reddy Mannuru, et al.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2023) Vol. 74, Iss. 5, pp. 570-581
Open Access | Times Cited: 463
How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought
Ludo Waltman, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Stephen Pinfield, et al.
Learned Publishing (2023) Vol. 36, Iss. 3, pp. 334-347
Open Access | Times Cited: 39
ChatGPT and other AI Users: Innovative and Creative Utilitarian Value and Mindset Shift
Arvin V. Duhaylungsod, Jason V. Chavez
Journal of Namibian Studies History Politics Culture (2023) Vol. 33
Open Access | Times Cited: 28
ChatGPT and a New Academic Reality: AI-Written Research Papers and the Ethics of the Large Language Models in Scholarly Publishing
Brady Lund, Ting Wang, Nishith Reddy Mannuru, et al.
SSRN Electronic Journal (2023)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 26
Additional experiments required: A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review
Tony Ross‐Hellauer, Serge P. J. M. Horbach
Research Evaluation (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Revise and resubmit? Peer reviewing business historical research
Christina Lubinski, Stephanie Decker, Niall MacKenzie
Business History (2024) Vol. 66, Iss. 4, pp. 773-792
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
There is no easy fix to peer review but paying referees and regulating the number of submissions might help
Mohamed L. Seghier
F1000Research (2024) Vol. 13, pp. 439-439
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Peer-review procedures as practice, decision, and governance—the road to theories of peer review
Martin Reinhart, Cornelia Schendzielorz
Science and Public Policy (2024) Vol. 51, Iss. 3, pp. 543-552
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process
Mohamed L. Seghier
F1000Research (2024) Vol. 13, pp. 439-439
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
«I Do Not Have Time»—Is This the End of Peer Review in Public Health Sciences?
Nino Künzli, Anke Berger, Katarzyna Czabanowska, et al.
Public health reviews (2022) Vol. 43
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review
Piitu Parmanne, Joonas Laajava, Noora Järvinen, et al.
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2023) Vol. 8, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
ChatGPT and the Moralities of Large Language Modelling in Research Publications
Sarabjeet Singh Sethi, Priyanka Sharma, A. V. Senthil Kumar
Advances in business information systems and analytics book series (2024), pp. 233-258
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Engaging Undergraduate Students in Preprint Peer Review
Dawn Liu Holford, Janet F. McLean, Alex O. Holcombe, et al.
(2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Prospects and Importance of Training Needs in Peer Review Models
Sunita Singh, A Sharma, Pankaj Kumar Chaurasia, et al.
(2024), pp. 347-365
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process
Mohamed L. Seghier
F1000Research (2024) Vol. 13, pp. 439-439
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought
Ludo Waltman, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Stephen Pinfield, et al.
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Preprints Are Here to Stay: Is That Good for Science?
Jadranka Stojanovski, Ana Marušić
Springer eBooks (2023), pp. 1383-1401
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
‘Conditional Acceptance’ (additional experiments required): A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review
Tony Ross‐Hellauer, Serge P. J. M. Horbach
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Preprints Are Here to Stay: Is That Good for Science?
Jadranka Stojanovski, Ana Marušić
Springer international handbooks of education (2024), pp. 1383-1401
Closed Access
Engaging undergraduate students in preprint peer review
Dawn Liu Holford, Janet F. McLean, Alex O. Holcombe, et al.
Active Learning in Higher Education (2024)
Open Access
No reward without responsibility: Focus on peer review reports
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Timothy Daly
Ethics Medicine and Public Health (2024) Vol. 33, pp. 101033-101033
Closed Access
The vital importance of being open: reflections on peer reviewing in scholarly publishing
Kirsi Pauliina Kallio
Scottish Geographical Journal (2023) Vol. 139, Iss. 1-2, pp. 150-159
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Preprints Are Here to Stay: Is That Good for Science?
Jadranka Stojanovski, Ana Marušić
(2023), pp. 1-20
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Historical Assessment of Three Extinct Portable Peer Review and Cascade Peer Review Models
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Library and Information Science Research E-Journal (2023) Vol. 33, Iss. 1
Open Access
Page 1

Scroll to top