Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
Charles W. Fox, C. Sean Burns, Jennifer Meyer
Functional Ecology (2015) Vol. 30, Iss. 1, pp. 140-153
Open Access | Times Cited: 115

Showing 1-25 of 115 citing articles:

Gender bias in scholarly peer review
Markus Helmer, Manuel Schottdorf, Andreas Neef, et al.
eLife (2017) Vol. 6
Open Access | Times Cited: 337
Journals invite too few women to referee
Jory Lerback, Brooks Hanson
Nature (2017) Vol. 541, Iss. 7638, pp. 455-457
Open Access | Times Cited: 264
Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM
Nyssa J. Silbiger, Amber D. Stubler
PeerJ (2019) Vol. 7, pp. e8247-e8247
Open Access | Times Cited: 166
Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals
Flaminio Squazzoni, Giangiacomo Bravo, Mike Farjam, et al.
Science Advances (2021) Vol. 7, Iss. 2
Open Access | Times Cited: 154
Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal
Charles W. Fox, Jennifer Meyer, Emilie Aimé
Functional Ecology (2023) Vol. 37, Iss. 5, pp. 1144-1157
Closed Access | Times Cited: 72
The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science
Hugo Horta, Jisun Jung
Higher Education Quarterly (2024) Vol. 78, Iss. 4
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review
Dakota Murray, Kyle Siler, Vincent Larivière, et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2018)
Open Access | Times Cited: 160
Citations increase with manuscript length, author number, and references cited in ecology journals
Charles W. Fox, C. E. Timothy Paine, Boris Sauterey
Ecology and Evolution (2016) Vol. 6, Iss. 21, pp. 7717-7726
Open Access | Times Cited: 143
How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace
Kathleen E. Grogan
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2018) Vol. 3, Iss. 1, pp. 3-6
Open Access | Times Cited: 140
Gender Representation on Journal Editorial Boards in the Mathematical Sciences
Chad M. Topaz, Shilad Sen
PLoS ONE (2016) Vol. 11, Iss. 8, pp. e0161357-e0161357
Open Access | Times Cited: 113
Peer review and the publication process
Parveen Ali, Roger Watson
Nursing Open (2016) Vol. 3, Iss. 4, pp. 193-202
Open Access | Times Cited: 105
Men ask more questions than women at a scientific conference
Amy Hinsley, William J. Sutherland, Alison Johnston
PLoS ONE (2017) Vol. 12, Iss. 10, pp. e0185534-e0185534
Open Access | Times Cited: 97
Comparing human and AI expertise in the academic peer review process: towards a hybrid approach
Shai Farber
Higher Education Research & Development (2025), pp. 1-15
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution
Charles W. Fox, Arianne Albert, Tim Vines
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2017) Vol. 2, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 79
A persistent lack of international representation on editorial boards in environmental biology
Johanna Espín, Sebastian Palmas, Farah Carrasco‐Rueda, et al.
PLoS Biology (2017) Vol. 15, Iss. 12, pp. e2002760-e2002760
Open Access | Times Cited: 78
Gender and international diversity improves equity in peer review
Dakota Murray, Kyle Siler, Vincent Larivière, et al.
(2018), pp. 400515
Open Access | Times Cited: 77
Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution
Charles W. Fox, Meghan A. Duffy, Daphne J. Fairbairn, et al.
Ecology and Evolution (2019) Vol. 9, Iss. 24, pp. 13636-13649
Open Access | Times Cited: 71
Women Are Underrepresented and Receive Differential Outcomes at ASM Journals: a Six-Year Retrospective Analysis
Ada K. Hagan, Begüm D. Topçuoğlu, Mia E. Gregory, et al.
mBio (2020) Vol. 11, Iss. 6
Open Access | Times Cited: 54
Is there a gender gap in chemical sciences scholarly communication?
Aileen Day, Peter Corbett, John Boyle
Chemical Science (2020) Vol. 11, Iss. 8, pp. 2277-2301
Open Access | Times Cited: 51
Editors are biased too: An extension of Fox et al. (2023)'s analysis makes the case for triple‐blind review
Diane S. Srivastava, Joana Bernardino, Ana Teresa Marques, et al.
Functional Ecology (2024) Vol. 38, Iss. 2, pp. 278-283
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Gender differences in patterns of authorship do not affect peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
Charles W. Fox, C. Sean Burns, Anna D. Muncy, et al.
Functional Ecology (2015) Vol. 30, Iss. 1, pp. 126-139
Open Access | Times Cited: 60
Who Makes Geographical Knowledge? The Gender of Geography’s Gatekeepers
Carolin Schurr, Martín Müller, Nadja Imhof
The Professional Geographer (2020) Vol. 72, Iss. 3, pp. 317-331
Open Access | Times Cited: 46
Pervasive gender bias in editorial boards of biodiversity conservation journals
Luisa Fernanda Liévano‐Latorre, Rafaela Aparecida da Silva, Raísa R. S. Vieira, et al.
Biological Conservation (2020) Vol. 251, pp. 108767-108767
Open Access | Times Cited: 40
A new model for inclusive membership in the AEM editorial board
Gemma Reguera
Applied and Environmental Microbiology (2023) Vol. 89, Iss. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
Gender differences in authorships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal
Hannah A Edwards, Julia Schroeder, Hannah L. Dugdale
PLoS ONE (2018) Vol. 13, Iss. 8, pp. e0201725-e0201725
Open Access | Times Cited: 43
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top