Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal
Charles W. Fox, Jennifer Meyer, Emilie Aimé
Functional Ecology (2023) Vol. 37, Iss. 5, pp. 1144-1157
Closed Access | Times Cited: 72

Showing 1-25 of 72 citing articles:

Global trends and biases in biodiversity conservation research
Iain R. Caldwell, J. Hobbs, Brian W. Bowen, et al.
Cell Reports Sustainability (2024) Vol. 1, Iss. 5, pp. 100082-100082
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science
Hugo Horta, Jisun Jung
Higher Education Quarterly (2024) Vol. 78, Iss. 4
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
Use of artificial intelligence and the future of peer review
Howard Bauchner, Frederick P. Rivara
Health Affairs Scholar (2024) Vol. 2, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
Three pathways to better recognize the expertise of Global South researchers
Gabriel Nakamura, Bruno Eleres Soares, Valério D. Pillar, et al.
npj Biodiversity (2023) Vol. 2, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 30
Academic publishing requires linguistically inclusive policies
Henry Arenas‐Castro, Violeta Berdejo‐Espinola, Shawan Chowdhury, et al.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (2024) Vol. 291, Iss. 2018
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
Implementing code review in the scientific workflow: Insights from ecology and evolutionary biology
Edward Ivimey‐Cook, Joel L. Pick, Kevin R. Bairos‐Novak, et al.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology (2023) Vol. 36, Iss. 10, pp. 1347-1356
Open Access | Times Cited: 20
Embrace responsible ChatGPT usage to overcome language barriers in academic writing
Mahmut Enes Kayaalp, Matthieu Ollivier, Philipp W. Winkler, et al.
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (2023) Vol. 32, Iss. 1, pp. 5-9
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
Scientific publishing has a language problem

Nature Human Behaviour (2023) Vol. 7, Iss. 7, pp. 1019-1020
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
Editors are biased too: An extension of Fox et al. (2023)'s analysis makes the case for triple‐blind review
Diane S. Srivastava, Joana Bernardino, Ana Teresa Marques, et al.
Functional Ecology (2024) Vol. 38, Iss. 2, pp. 278-283
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Who is publishing in ecology and evolution? the underrepresentation of women and the Global South
Alice C. Hughes, Kay Zin Than, Krizler C. Tanalgo, et al.
Frontiers in Environmental Science (2023) Vol. 11
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
The case for open research in entomology: Reducing harm, refining reproducibility and advancing insect science
Jordan P. Cuff, Meghan Barrett, Helen Gray, et al.
Agricultural and Forest Entomology (2024) Vol. 26, Iss. 3, pp. 285-295
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Academic publishing requires linguistically inclusive policies
Henry Arenas‐Castro, Violeta Berdejo‐Espinola, Shawan Chowdhury, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
ChatGPT identifies gender disparities in scientific peer review
Jeroen P. H. Verharen
eLife (2023) Vol. 12
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity
Christopher A. Mebane
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (2025) Vol. 44, Iss. 2, pp. 318-323
Closed Access
Community-engaged research enhances the scientific quality and societal impact of a long-term avian monitoring program in northwest Ecuador
Jordan Karubian, Jorge Olivo, Domingo Cabrera, et al.
Frontiers in Conservation Science (2025) Vol. 5
Open Access
Threats to grant peer review: a qualitative study
Joanie Sims‐Gould, Anne M. Lasinsky, Adrian Soto‐Mota, et al.
BMJ Open (2025) Vol. 15, Iss. 2, pp. e091666-e091666
Open Access
Impact of institutional affiliation bias in the peer review process
R. Horchani
Insights the UKSG journal (2025) Vol. 38
Open Access
Lessons from the Diversity Forum at the 2023 Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of America
Bruno Eleres Soares, Karen M. Bailey, Danielle D. Ignace, et al.
Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America (2025)
Open Access
Reducing bias in the peer‐review process
Jacqueline L. Frair
Journal of Wildlife Management (2025)
Closed Access
The Challenges and Future of Peer Review
Howard Bauchner, Frederick P. Rivara
Critical Care Medicine (2025)
Closed Access
Enhancing agroecological transitions: From locally-adapted protocols to a global transdisciplinary applied approach.
Blas Lavandero, Mauricio González-Chang, Roberto Jara‐Rojas, et al.
Farming System (2025), pp. 100154-100154
Open Access
A systematic evidence map and bibliometric analysis of the behavioural impacts of pesticide exposure on zebrafish
Kyle Morrison, Yefeng Yang, Manuela S. Santana, et al.
Environmental Pollution (2024) Vol. 347, pp. 123630-123630
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
The changing roles of scientific journals
Arturo Casadevall, Lorraine F. Clark, Ferric C. Fang
mBio (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Legume integration for biological control deserves a firmer scientific base
Kris A. G. Wyckhuys, Mauricio González-Chang, Blas Lavandero, et al.
Outlook on Agriculture (2023) Vol. 52, Iss. 3, pp. 281-293
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
How international are public administration journals? An analysis of the persistent Anglo‐American dominance in public administration journals
Jianzheng Liu, Yifei Xu, Xinyun Zhang, et al.
Public Administration (2024)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top