Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Multispecies genetic objectives in spatial conservation planning
Erica S. Nielsen, Maria Beger, Romina Henriques, et al.
Conservation Biology (2016) Vol. 31, Iss. 4, pp. 872-882
Open Access | Times Cited: 52

Showing 1-25 of 52 citing articles:

From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff
Xavier Turón, Adrià Antich, Creu Palacín, et al.
Ecological Applications (2019) Vol. 30, Iss. 2
Open Access | Times Cited: 104
Using phylogeography to define conservation priorities: The case of narrow endemic plants in the Mediterranean Basin hotspot
Frédéric Mèdail, Alex Baumel
Biological Conservation (2018) Vol. 224, pp. 258-266
Open Access | Times Cited: 91
Molecular ecology meets systematic conservation planning
Erica S. Nielsen, Jeffrey O. Hanson, Sílvia B. Carvalho, et al.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution (2022) Vol. 38, Iss. 2, pp. 143-155
Open Access | Times Cited: 52
Evolving spatial conservation prioritization with intraspecific genetic data
Marco Andrello, Cassidy C. D’Aloia, Alicia Dalongeville, et al.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution (2022) Vol. 37, Iss. 6, pp. 553-564
Open Access | Times Cited: 43
The application gap: Genomics for biodiversity and ecosystem service management
Myriam Heuertz, Sílvia B. Carvalho, Juan Galindo, et al.
Biological Conservation (2023) Vol. 278, pp. 109883-109883
Open Access | Times Cited: 37
Environmental and geographic variables are effective surrogates for genetic variation in conservation planning
Jeffrey O. Hanson, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Cynthia Riginos, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2017) Vol. 114, Iss. 48, pp. 12755-12760
Open Access | Times Cited: 77
Incorporating putatively neutral and adaptive genomic data into marine conservation planning
Amanda Xuereb, Cassidy C. D’Aloia, Marco Andrello, et al.
Conservation Biology (2020) Vol. 35, Iss. 3, pp. 909-920
Closed Access | Times Cited: 52
Conservation macrogenetics: harnessing genetic data to meet conservation commitments
Chloé Schmidt, Sean Hoban, Walter Jetz
Trends in Genetics (2023) Vol. 39, Iss. 11, pp. 816-829
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18
Putatively adaptive genetic variation in the giant California sea cucumber (Parastichopus californicus) as revealed by environmental association analysis of restriction‐site associated DNA sequencing data
Amanda Xuereb, Christopher M. Kimber, Janelle M. R. Curtis, et al.
Molecular Ecology (2018) Vol. 27, Iss. 24, pp. 5035-5048
Closed Access | Times Cited: 51
Genetic and Biophysical Models Help Define Marine Conservation Focus Areas
Lisa E. A. Mertens, Eric A. Treml, Sophie von der Heyden
Frontiers in Marine Science (2018) Vol. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 39
Extreme seascape drives local recruitment and genetic divergence in brooding and spawning corals in remote north‐west Australia
Jim N. Underwood, Zoe T. Richards, Oliver Berry, et al.
Evolutionary Applications (2020) Vol. 13, Iss. 9, pp. 2404-2421
Open Access | Times Cited: 33
Multi-species genetic patterns in a modified temperate forest from central Mexico
Alejandro Flores‐Manzanero, Itzel Arias‐Del Razo, Stephanie Hereira‐Pacheco, et al.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (2025) Vol. 144, Iss. 3
Closed Access
Informing marine spatial planning decisions with environmental DNA
Alessia Bani, Maarten De Brauwer, Simon Creer, et al.
Advances in ecological research/Advances in Ecological Research (2020), pp. 375-407
Closed Access | Times Cited: 32
Conservation planning for adaptive and neutral evolutionary processes
Jeffrey O. Hanson, Adam Marques, Ana Veríssimo, et al.
Journal of Applied Ecology (2020) Vol. 57, Iss. 11, pp. 2159-2169
Open Access | Times Cited: 32
Anthropogenic pressures negatively impact genomic diversity of the vulnerable seagrass Zostera capensis
Nikki Leanne Phair, Robert J. Toonen, Ingrid S. Knapp, et al.
Journal of Environmental Management (2019) Vol. 255, pp. 109831-109831
Open Access | Times Cited: 31
A comparison of genetic and genomic approaches to represent evolutionary potential in conservation planning
Erica S. Nielsen, Maria Beger, Romina Henriques, et al.
Biological Conservation (2020) Vol. 251, pp. 108770-108770
Open Access | Times Cited: 28
Comparative phylogeography in a marine biodiversity hotspot provides novel insights into evolutionary processes across the Atlantic‐Indian Ocean transition
Alicia Dalongeville, Erica S. Nielsen, Peter R. Teske, et al.
Diversity and Distributions (2022) Vol. 28, Iss. 12, pp. 2622-2636
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
Incorporating Genetic Measures of Connectivity and Adaptation in Marine Spatial Planning for Corals
Cynthia Riginos, Maria Beger
Coral reefs of the world (2022), pp. 7-33
Closed Access | Times Cited: 14
A multispecies approach reveals hot spots and cold spots of diversity and connectivity in invertebrate species with contrasting dispersal modes
Abigail Cahill, Aurélien De Jode, Sophie Dubois, et al.
Molecular Ecology (2017) Vol. 26, Iss. 23, pp. 6563-6577
Open Access | Times Cited: 27
Complex signatures of genomic variation of two non-model marine species in a homogeneous environment
Erica S. Nielsen, Romina Henriques, Robert J. Toonen, et al.
BMC Genomics (2018) Vol. 19, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 27
Marine Conservation and Marine Protected Areas
Amanda Xuereb, Cassidy C. D’Aloia, Rémi Daigle, et al.
Population genomics (2019), pp. 423-446
Closed Access | Times Cited: 24
From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff
Xavier Turón, Adrià Antich, Creu Palacín, et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2019)
Open Access | Times Cited: 24
Evaluating surrogates of genetic diversity for conservation planning
Jeffrey O. Hanson, Ana Veríssimo, Guillermo Velo‐Antón, et al.
Conservation Biology (2020) Vol. 35, Iss. 2, pp. 634-642
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
Climate differently influences the genomic patterns of two sympatric marine fish species
Emilie Boulanger, Laura Benestan, Pierre‐Édouard Guérin, et al.
Journal of Animal Ecology (2021) Vol. 91, Iss. 6, pp. 1180-1195
Open Access | Times Cited: 20
Applying genomic data to seagrass conservation
Nikki Leanne Phair, Erica S. Nielsen, Sophie von der Heyden
Biodiversity and Conservation (2021) Vol. 30, Iss. 7, pp. 2079-2096
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top