Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Who Shalt Not Kill? Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity, Executive Control, and Moral Judgment
Adam B. Moore, Brian A. Clark, Michael J. Kane
Psychological Science (2008) Vol. 19, Iss. 6, pp. 549-557
Open Access | Times Cited: 390

Showing 1-25 of 390 citing articles:

Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
Hugo Mercier, Dan Sperber
Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2011) Vol. 34, Iss. 2, pp. 57-74
Open Access | Times Cited: 2015
Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach.
Paul Conway, Bertram Gawronski
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2012) Vol. 104, Iss. 2, pp. 216-235
Closed Access | Times Cited: 635
Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment
Joshua D. Greene, Fiery Cushman, Lisa E. Stewart, et al.
Cognition (2009) Vol. 111, Iss. 3, pp. 364-371
Open Access | Times Cited: 606
The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas
Daniel M. Bartels, David A. Pizarro
Cognition (2011) Vol. 121, Iss. 1, pp. 154-161
Closed Access | Times Cited: 440
Action, Outcome, and Value
Fiery Cushman
Personality and Social Psychology Review (2013) Vol. 17, Iss. 3, pp. 273-292
Closed Access | Times Cited: 415
Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment
Joseph M. Paxton, Leo Ungar, Joshua D. Greene
Cognitive Science (2011) Vol. 36, Iss. 1, pp. 163-177
Open Access | Times Cited: 395
Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology.
Guy Kahane, Jim A. C. Everett, Brian D. Earp, et al.
Psychological Review (2017) Vol. 125, Iss. 2, pp. 131-164
Open Access | Times Cited: 374
Psychopaths know right from wrong but don’t care
Maaike Cima, Franca Tonnaer, Marc D. Hauser
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (2010) Vol. 5, Iss. 1, pp. 59-67
Open Access | Times Cited: 348
‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good
Guy Kahane, Jim A. C. Everett, Brian D. Earp, et al.
Cognition (2014) Vol. 134, pp. 193-209
Open Access | Times Cited: 303
Are liars ethical? On the tension between benevolence and honesty
Emma E. Levine, Maurice E. Schweitzer
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2014) Vol. 53, pp. 107-117
Open Access | Times Cited: 283
Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review
Julia F. Christensen, Antoni Gomila
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (2012) Vol. 36, Iss. 4, pp. 1249-1264
Closed Access | Times Cited: 273
Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment
Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht, Liane Young
PLoS ONE (2013) Vol. 8, Iss. 4, pp. e60418-e60418
Open Access | Times Cited: 254
Moral Judgment and Decision Making
Daniel M. Bartels, Christopher W. Bauman, Fiery Cushman, et al.
(2015), pp. 478-515
Open Access | Times Cited: 202
Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment
Guy Kahane
Social Neuroscience (2015) Vol. 10, Iss. 5, pp. 551-560
Open Access | Times Cited: 182
Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers
Paul Conway, Jacob Goldstein-Greenwood, David Aaron Polacek, et al.
Cognition (2018) Vol. 179, pp. 241-265
Closed Access | Times Cited: 173
Advancing theorizing about fast-and-slow thinking
Wim De Neys
Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2022) Vol. 46
Open Access | Times Cited: 118
Dual-process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie
Joshua D. Greene
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2009) Vol. 45, Iss. 3, pp. 581-584
Open Access | Times Cited: 260
Innocent intentions: A correlation between forgiveness for accidental harm and neural activity☆
Liane Young, Rebecca Saxe
Neuropsychologia (2009) Vol. 47, Iss. 10, pp. 2065-2072
Closed Access | Times Cited: 248
Moral Reasoning: Hints and Allegations
Joseph M. Paxton, Joshua D. Greene
Topics in Cognitive Science (2010) Vol. 2, Iss. 3, pp. 511-527
Open Access | Times Cited: 201
The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values
Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, et al.
Thinking & Reasoning (2013) Vol. 20, Iss. 2, pp. 188-214
Open Access | Times Cited: 168
The Ethical Climate and Context of Organizations: A Comprehensive Model
Anke Arnaud, Marshall Schminke
Organization Science (2011) Vol. 23, Iss. 6, pp. 1767-1780
Closed Access | Times Cited: 158
Reduced empathic concern leads to utilitarian moral judgments in trait alexithymia
Indrajeet Patil, Giorgia Silani
Frontiers in Psychology (2014) Vol. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 156
Cultural differences in responses to real-life and hypothetical trolley problems
Natalie Gold, Andrew M. Colman, Briony D. Pulford
Judgment and Decision Making (2014) Vol. 9, Iss. 1, pp. 65-76
Open Access | Times Cited: 154
The Costs and Benefits of Calculation and Moral Rules
Will M. Bennis, Douglas L. Medin, Daniel M. Bartels
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2010) Vol. 5, Iss. 2, pp. 187-202
Closed Access | Times Cited: 154
Moral identity in psychopathy
Andrea L. Glenn, Spassena Koleva, Ravi Iyer, et al.
Judgment and Decision Making (2010) Vol. 5, Iss. 7, pp. 497-505
Open Access | Times Cited: 153
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top