Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Impact of audit and feedback with action implementation toolbox on improving ICU pain management: cluster-randomised controlled trial
Marie-José Roos-Blom, Wouter T. Gude, Evert de Jonge, et al.
BMJ Quality & Safety (2019), pp. bmjqs-009588
Open Access | Times Cited: 32

Showing 1-25 of 32 citing articles:

Revitalising audit and feedback to improve patient care
Robbie Foy, Mirek Skrypak, Sarah Alderson, et al.
BMJ (2020), pp. m213-m213
Open Access | Times Cited: 117
National ICU Registries as Enablers of Clinical Research and Quality Improvement
Jorge I. Salluh, Amanda Quintairos, Dave A. Dongelmans, et al.
Critical Care Medicine (2023) Vol. 52, Iss. 1, pp. 125-135
Closed Access | Times Cited: 20
Identifying behaviour change techniques in 287 randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback interventions targeting practice change among healthcare professionals
Jacob Crawshaw, Carly Meyer, Vivi Antonopoulou, et al.
Implementation Science (2023) Vol. 18, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Features and effectiveness of electronic audit and feedback for patient safety and quality of care in hospitals: A systematic review
James Soresi, Christina Bertilone, Eileen Banks, et al.
Health Informatics Journal (2025) Vol. 31, Iss. 1
Open Access
Impact of provider feedback on quality improvement in rehabilitation services: an interrupted time series analysis
Anne‐Lene Sand‐Svartrud, Hanne Dagfinrud, Johanne Fossen, et al.
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences (2025) Vol. 6
Open Access
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice
Noah Ivers, Sharlini Yogasingam, Meagan Lacroix, et al.
Cochrane library (2025) Vol. 2025, Iss. 3
Closed Access
Linking of global intensive care (LOGIC): An international benchmarking in critical care initiative
Dave A. Dongelmans, David Pilcher, Abigail Beane, et al.
Journal of Critical Care (2020) Vol. 60, pp. 305-310
Open Access | Times Cited: 31
A Systematic Review of Electronic Medical Record Driven Quality Measurement and Feedback Systems
Candice Donnelly, Anna Janssen, Shalini Vinod, et al.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2022) Vol. 20, Iss. 1, pp. 200-200
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
Effectiveness of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention to improve patient outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a registry nested cluster randomised controlled trial
Peter van Schie, Leti van Bodegom‐Vos, Tristan M Zijdeman, et al.
BMJ Quality & Safety (2022) Vol. 32, Iss. 1, pp. 34-46
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Comparing effects of two higher intensity feedback interventions with simple feedback on improving staff communication in nursing homes—the INFORM cluster-randomized controlled trial
Matthias Hoben, Liane Ginsburg, Adam Easterbrook, et al.
Implementation Science (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
Pain assessment of the adult sedated and ventilated patients in the intensive care setting: A scoping review
Samira Hamadeh, Loretta Garvey, Gavin Lambert, et al.
International Journal of Nursing Studies (2021) Vol. 122, pp. 104044-104044
Closed Access | Times Cited: 15
Process evaluations undertaken alongside randomised controlled trials in the hospital setting: A scoping review
Ishtar Lockwood, Rachel Walker, Sharon Latimer, et al.
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications (2022) Vol. 26, pp. 100894-100894
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care
Wouter T. Gude, Marie-José Roos-Blom, Sabine N van der Veer, et al.
Implementation Science (2019) Vol. 14, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
What intensive care registries can teach us about outcomes
Abi Beane, Jorge I. Salluh, Rashan Haniffa
Current Opinion in Critical Care (2021) Vol. 27, Iss. 5, pp. 537-543
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia
Michael Sykes, Richard Thomson, Niina Kolehmainen, et al.
Implementation Science (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Towards Better Perioperative Pain Management in Mexico: A Study in a Network of Hospitals Using Quality Improvement Methods from PAIN OUT
Ana Lilia Garduño-López, Victor Manuel Acosta Nava, Lisette Castro Garcés, et al.
Journal of Pain Research (2021) Vol. Volume 14, pp. 415-430
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Quality improvement of Dutch ICUs from 2009 to 2021: A registry based observational study
Marie-José Roos-Blom, Ferishta Bakhshi‐Raiez, Sylvia Brinkman, et al.
Journal of Critical Care (2023) Vol. 79, pp. 154461-154461
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
International comparison of variation in performance between hospitals for THA and TKA: Is it even possible? A systematic review including 33 studies and 8 arthroplasty register reports
Peter van Schie, Shaho Hasan, Leti van Bodegom‐Vos, et al.
EFORT Open Reviews (2022) Vol. 7, Iss. 4, pp. 247-263
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
You can lead clinicians to water, but you can’t make them drink: the role of tailoring in clinical performance feedback to improve care quality
Laura Desveaux, Zahava R. S. Rosenberg-Yunger, Noah Ivers
BMJ Quality & Safety (2022) Vol. 32, Iss. 2, pp. 76-80
Closed Access | Times Cited: 6
Awareness of performance on outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty among Dutch orthopedic surgeons: how to improve feedback from arthroplasty registries
Peter van Schie, Leti van Bodegom‐Vos, Tristan M Zijdeman, et al.
Acta Orthopaedica (2020) Vol. 92, Iss. 1, pp. 54-61
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Rationale, Methodological Quality, and Reporting of Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trials in Critical Care Medicine: A Systematic Review
David J. Cook, William B. Rutherford, Damon C. Scales, et al.
Critical Care Medicine (2021) Vol. 49, Iss. 6, pp. 977-987
Closed Access | Times Cited: 8
Interventions to optimise the outputs of national clinical audits to improve the quality of health care: a multi-method study including RCT
Thomas A. Willis, Alexandra Wright‐Hughes, Ana Weller, et al.
Health and Social Care Delivery Research (2022) Vol. 10, Iss. 15, pp. 1-284
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Evaluating a Physician Audit and Feedback Intervention to Increase Clinical Trial Enrollment in Radiation Oncology in a Multisite Tertiary Cancer Center: A Randomized Study
Nicholas Peter Verdini, D. Gelblum, Emily Vertosick, et al.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (2023) Vol. 119, Iss. 1, pp. 11-16
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
A scoping review of local quality improvement using data from UK perioperative National Clinical Audits
Duncan Wagstaff, Samantha Warnakulasuriya, Georgina Singleton, et al.
Perioperative Medicine (2022) Vol. 11, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Requirements for a Dashboard to Support Quality Improvement Teams in Pain Management
Jeremy Opie, Maura Bellio, Rachel A. Williams, et al.
Frontiers in Big Data (2021) Vol. 4
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top