Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Can High-Dimensional Questionnaires Resolve the Ipsativity Issue of Forced-Choice Response Formats?
Niklas Schulte, Heinz Holling, Paul‐Christian Bürkner
Educational and Psychological Measurement (2020) Vol. 81, Iss. 2, pp. 262-289
Open Access | Times Cited: 24

Showing 24 citing articles:

Mixed-Keying or Desirability-Matching in the Construction of Forced-Choice Measures? An Empirical Investigation and Practical Recommendations
Mengtong Li, Bo Zhang, Lingyue Li, et al.
Organizational Research Methods (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Faking by actual applicants on personality tests: A meta‐analysis of within‐subjects studies
Jing Hu, Brian S. Connelly
International Journal of Selection and Assessment (2021) Vol. 29, Iss. 3-4, pp. 412-426
Closed Access | Times Cited: 40
On the Information Obtainable from Comparative Judgments
Paul‐Christian Bürkner
Psychometrika (2022) Vol. 87, Iss. 4, pp. 1439-1472
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Personality development goals at work: A new frontier in personality assessment in organizations
Sofie Dupré, Bart Wille
International Journal of Selection and Assessment (2024)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 4
Comparing Approaches to Estimating Person Parameters for the MUPP Model
David M. LaHuis, Caitlin E. Blackmore, Gage M. Ammons
Applied Psychological Measurement (2025)
Closed Access
Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data
Susanne Frick, Anna Brown, Eunike Wetzel
Multivariate Behavioral Research (2021) Vol. 58, Iss. 1, pp. 1-29
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
Estimating and Using Block Information in the Thurstonian IRT Model
Susanne Frick
Psychometrika (2023) Vol. 88, Iss. 4, pp. 1556-1589
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Multidimensional IRT for forced choice tests: A literature review
Lei Nie, Pengjiang Xu, Di Hu
Heliyon (2024) Vol. 10, Iss. 5, pp. e26884-e26884
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
The Fakeability of Personality Measurement with Graded Paired Comparisons
Niklas Schulte, Lucas Kaup, Paul‐Christian Bürkner, et al.
Journal of Business and Psychology (2024) Vol. 39, Iss. 5, pp. 1067-1084
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
On Bank Assembly and Block Selection in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Adaptive Assessments
Rodrigo S. Kreitchmann, Miguel A. Sorrel, Francisco J. Abad
Educational and Psychological Measurement (2022) Vol. 83, Iss. 2, pp. 294-321
Closed Access | Times Cited: 7
Introducing a supervised alternative to forced‐choice personality scoring: A test of validity and resistance to faking
Andrew B. Speer, Angie Y. Delacruz
International Journal of Selection and Assessment (2021) Vol. 29, Iss. 3-4, pp. 448-466
Closed Access | Times Cited: 9
Reduction of faking with the use of a forced‐choice personality test: Cross‐cultural comparisons between South Korea and the United States
HyeSun Lee
International Journal of Selection and Assessment (2022) Vol. 31, Iss. 1, pp. 147-162
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Why Forced-Choice and Likert Items Provide the Same Information on Personality, Including Social Desirability
Martin Bäckström, Fredrik Björklund
Educational and Psychological Measurement (2023) Vol. 84, Iss. 3, pp. 549-576
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
The Fakeability of Personality Measurement with Graded Paired Comparisons
Niklas Schulte, Lucas Kaup, Paul‐Christian Bürkner, et al.
(2021)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 4
Equally vs. unequally keyed blocks in forced-choice questionnaires: Implications on validity and reliability
Diego F. Graña, Rodrigo S. Kreitchmann, Francisco J. Abad, et al.
Journal of Personality Assessment (2024), pp. 1-14
Closed Access
Not Liking the Likert? A Rasch Analysis of Forced-choice Format and Usefulness in Survey Design
Celeste Combrinck
SAGE Open (2024) Vol. 14, Iss. 4
Open Access
Measuring Personality When Stakes Are High: Are Graded Paired Comparisons a More Reliable Alternative to Traditional Forced-Choice Methods?
Harriet Lingel, Paul‐Christian Bürkner, Klaus G. Melchers, et al.
Organizational Research Methods (2024)
Open Access
Linear Factor Analytic Thurstonian Forced-Choice Models: Current Status and Issues
Markus Thomas Jansen, Ralf Schulze
Educational and Psychological Measurement (2023) Vol. 84, Iss. 4, pp. 660-690
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
The More Contextualized, the More Valid: Effects of Contextualization Strategies on Forced-choice Measurement
Lingyue Li, Bo Zhang, Tianjun Sun, et al.
Journal of Business and Psychology (2024)
Closed Access
Measuring Personality When Stakes Are High: Are Graded Paired Comparisons a More Reliable Alternative to Traditional Forced-Choice Methods?
Harriet Lingel, Paul‐Christian Bürkner, Klaus Gerhard Melchers, et al.
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
“Use the Force!” Adaptation of response formats: From rating scale to multidimensional forced choice
Alexander Leonard Schünemann, Matthias Ziegler
(2023)
Open Access
“Use the Force!” Adaptation of Response Formats
Alexander Leonard Schünemann, Matthias Ziegler
Psychological Test Adaptation and Development (2023) Vol. 4, Iss. 1, pp. 218-234
Open Access
IRT-based scoring methods for multidimensional forced choice tests
Juan LIU, Chanjin ZHENG, Yunchuan LI, et al.
Advances in Psychological Science (2022) Vol. 30, Iss. 6, pp. 1410-1428
Open Access
Testing the validity of a Latvian multidimensional forced-choice personality inventory
Linda Berga, Ivars Austers
Psihologija (2022) Vol. 57, Iss. 1, pp. 93-110
Open Access
Page 1

Scroll to top