Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
Jonathan Tennant, Jonathan M. Dugan, Daniel Graziotin, et al.
F1000Research (2017) Vol. 6, pp. 1151-1151
Open Access | Times Cited: 38

Showing 1-25 of 38 citing articles:

Open collaborative writing with Manubot
Daniel Himmelstein, Vincent Rubinetti, David R. Slochower, et al.
PLoS Computational Biology (2019) Vol. 15, Iss. 6, pp. e1007128-e1007128
Open Access | Times Cited: 79
Towards a Decentralized Process for Scientific Publication and Peer Review using Blockchain and IPFS
Antonio Tenorio-Fornés, Viktor Jacynycz, David Llop-Vila, et al.
Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019)
Open Access | Times Cited: 69
Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing
Eric M. Prager, Karen E. Chambers, Joshua L. Plotkin, et al.
Journal of Neuroscience Research (2018) Vol. 97, Iss. 4, pp. 377-390
Open Access | Times Cited: 62
On the prospects of blockchain and distributed ledger technologies for open science and academic publishing
Krzysztof Janowicz, Blake Regalia, Pascal Hitzler, et al.
Semantic Web (2018) Vol. 9, Iss. 5, pp. 545-555
Open Access | Times Cited: 55
Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi‐stakeholder perspective on causes and effects
Anna Severin, Joanna Chataway
Learned Publishing (2021) Vol. 34, Iss. 4, pp. 537-546
Open Access | Times Cited: 40
How to Practice Academic Medicine and Publish from Developing Countries?
Samiran Nundy, Atul Kakar, Zulfiqar A Bhutta
(2021)
Open Access | Times Cited: 35
The changed – and changing – landscape of serials publishing: Review of the literature on emerging models
Eti Herman, John Akeroyd, Gaëlle Béquet, et al.
Learned Publishing (2020) Vol. 33, Iss. 3, pp. 213-229
Closed Access | Times Cited: 33
Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing
Eric M. Prager, Karen E. Chambers, Joshua L. Plotkin, et al.
Brain and Behavior (2018) Vol. 9, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 38
Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions
Anna Severin, Joanna Chataway
Learned Publishing (2020) Vol. 34, Iss. 2, pp. 144-155
Open Access | Times Cited: 27
The consistency of peer-reviewers: Assessment of separate parts of the manuscripts vs final recommendations
Monika Bolek, Cezary Bolek, Jovan Shopovski, et al.
Accountability in Research (2022) Vol. 30, Iss. 7, pp. 493-515
Closed Access | Times Cited: 12
Is the quality of reviews reflected in editors' and authors' satisfaction with peer review? A cross‐sectional study in 12 journals across four research fields
Shelly Melissa Pranić, Mario Malički, Stjepan Ljudevit Marušić, et al.
Learned Publishing (2020) Vol. 34, Iss. 2, pp. 187-197
Closed Access | Times Cited: 14
Ants-Review: A Privacy-Oriented Protocol for Incentivized Open Peer Reviews on Ethereum
Bianca Trovó, Nazzareno Massari
Lecture notes in computer science (2021), pp. 18-29
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Charting the Constellation of Science Reform
Sarahanne Field
ResearchEquals (2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
We need the open artefact: Design Science as a pathway to Open Science in Information Systems research
Cathal Doyle, Markus Luczak–Roesch, Abhinav Mittal
(2019)
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing
Eric M. Prager, Karen E. Chambers, Joshua L. Plotkin, et al.
Cancer Reports (2018) Vol. 2, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Should authors cite sources suggested by peer reviewers? Six antidotes for handling potentially coercive reviewer citation suggestions
Sam McLeod
Learned Publishing (2020) Vol. 34, Iss. 2, pp. 282-286
Closed Access | Times Cited: 7
Progressive and Degenerative Journals: On the Growth and Appraisal of Knowledge in Scholarly Publishing
Daniel J. Dunleavy
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review
Jeremy Y. Ng, Kelly D. Cobey, Saad Ahmed, et al.
PLoS ONE (2023) Vol. 18, Iss. 3, pp. e0282168-e0282168
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Post-publication peer review in biomedical journals: overcoming obstacles and disincentives to knowledge sharing
Valerie Matarese, Karen Shashok
(2018)
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Charting the Constellation of Science Reform
Sarahanne Field
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Making peer review evidence-based: It’s time to open the "black box"
Daniel J. Dunleavy
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Expansão ontoepistemológica e práticas pedagógicas na sociedade digital: novas perspectivas para o processo de letramentos
Rodrigo Silva
(2024)
Open Access
Facilitating Constructive Criticism of Established Scientific Paradigms
Hartmut Traunmüller
(2024)
Open Access
Post-publication peer review: another sort of quality control of the scientific record in biomedicine
Mirna Martínez‐Saucedo, Samara Téllez-Camacho, Guillermo Aquino‐Jarquín, et al.
Gaceta Médica de México (2021) Vol. 156, Iss. 6
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Peer review blinding practices of highly ranked dental journals: analysis and discussion
Clóvis Mariano Faggion
BDJ (2021)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top