Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity
Alfredo Yegros-Yegros, Ismael Ràfols, Pablo D’Este
PLoS ONE (2015) Vol. 10, Iss. 8, pp. e0135095-e0135095
Open Access | Times Cited: 286

Showing 1-25 of 286 citing articles:

Science of science
Santo Fortunato, Carl T. Bergstrom, Katy Börner, et al.
Science (2018) Vol. 359, Iss. 6379
Open Access | Times Cited: 1067
Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success
Lindell Bromham, Russell Dinnage, Xia Hua
Nature (2016) Vol. 534, Iss. 7609, pp. 684-687
Closed Access | Times Cited: 516
Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators
Jian Wang, Reinhilde Veugelers, Paula E. Stephan
Research Policy (2017) Vol. 46, Iss. 8, pp. 1416-1436
Open Access | Times Cited: 419
The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems
An Zeng, Zhesi Shen, Jianlin Zhou, et al.
Physics Reports (2017) Vol. 714-715, pp. 1-73
Open Access | Times Cited: 379
The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science.
Kara L. Hall, Amanda L. Vogel, Grace C. Huang, et al.
American Psychologist (2018) Vol. 73, Iss. 4, pp. 532-548
Open Access | Times Cited: 369
Prominent but Less Productive
Erin Leahey, Christine M. Beckman, Taryn L. Stanko
Administrative Science Quarterly (2016) Vol. 62, Iss. 1, pp. 105-139
Open Access | Times Cited: 350
The citation advantage of linking publications to research data
Giovanni Colavizza, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Isla Staden, et al.
PLoS ONE (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 4, pp. e0230416-e0230416
Open Access | Times Cited: 280
What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice
Miles MacLeod
Synthese (2016) Vol. 195, Iss. 2, pp. 697-720
Open Access | Times Cited: 239
Many brains are better than one: the importance of interdisciplinary studies on COVID-19 in and beyond tourism
Jun Wen, Wei Wang, Metin Kozak, et al.
Tourism Recreation Research (2020) Vol. 46, Iss. 2, pp. 310-313
Closed Access | Times Cited: 208
Serendipity: Towards a taxonomy and a theory
Ohid Yaqub
Research Policy (2017) Vol. 47, Iss. 1, pp. 169-179
Open Access | Times Cited: 202
Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science
Lu Liu, Benjamin F. Jones, Brian Uzzi, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2023) Vol. 7, Iss. 7, pp. 1046-1058
Open Access | Times Cited: 46
Interdisciplinarity revisited: evidence for research impact and dynamism
Keisuke Okamura
Palgrave Communications (2019) Vol. 5, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 137
Are top-cited papers more interdisciplinary?
Shiji Chen, Clément Arsenault, Vincent Larivière
Journal of Informetrics (2015) Vol. 9, Iss. 4, pp. 1034-1046
Closed Access | Times Cited: 122
An interdisciplinary model for macroeconomics
Andy Haldane, Arthur Turrell
Oxford Review of Economic Policy (2017) Vol. 34, Iss. 1-2, pp. 219-251
Open Access | Times Cited: 112
Division of labor in collaborative knowledge production: The role of team size and interdisciplinarity
Carolin Haeussler, Henry Sauermann
Research Policy (2020) Vol. 49, Iss. 6, pp. 103987-103987
Closed Access | Times Cited: 94
The relationship between interdisciplinarity and distinct modes of university-industry interaction
Pablo D’Este, Óscar Llopis, Francesco Rentocchini, et al.
Research Policy (2019) Vol. 48, Iss. 9, pp. 103799-103799
Open Access | Times Cited: 86
Concentration or dispersal of research funding?
Kaare Aagaard, Alexander Kladakis, Mathias Wullum Nielsen
Quantitative Science Studies (2019) Vol. 1, Iss. 1, pp. 117-149
Open Access | Times Cited: 79
New and atypical combinations: An assessment of novelty and interdisciplinarity
Magda Fontana, Martina Iori, Fabio Montobbio, et al.
Research Policy (2020) Vol. 49, Iss. 7, pp. 104063-104063
Closed Access | Times Cited: 78
Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes
Alison Specht, Kevin Crowston
PLoS ONE (2022) Vol. 17, Iss. 11, pp. e0278043-e0278043
Open Access | Times Cited: 51
Interdisciplinary Collaboration between Natural and Social Sciences – Status and Trends Exemplified in Groundwater Research
Roland Barthel, Roman Seidl
PLoS ONE (2017) Vol. 12, Iss. 1, pp. e0170754-e0170754
Open Access | Times Cited: 74
Measuring originality in science
Sotaro Shibayama, Jian Wang
Scientometrics (2019) Vol. 122, Iss. 1, pp. 409-427
Open Access | Times Cited: 74
Philosophy of science for sustainability science
Michiru Nagatsu, Taylor Davis, C. Tyler DesRoches, et al.
Sustainability Science (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 6, pp. 1807-1817
Open Access | Times Cited: 69
Interdisciplinary research in tourism
Fevzi Okumuş, Mathilda van Niekerk, Mehmet Ali Köseoğlu, et al.
Tourism Management (2018) Vol. 69, pp. 540-549
Open Access | Times Cited: 65
On the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and Mendeley readership counts: A large-scale analysis of Web of Science publications
Zohreh Zahedi, Stefanie Haustein
Journal of Informetrics (2018) Vol. 12, Iss. 1, pp. 191-202
Open Access | Times Cited: 63
The more multidisciplinary the better? – The prevalence and interdisciplinarity of research collaborations in multidisciplinary institutions
Zhiya Zuo, Kang Zhao
Journal of Informetrics (2018) Vol. 12, Iss. 3, pp. 736-756
Closed Access | Times Cited: 62
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top