Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Responsible Research Assessment I: Implementing DORA for hiring and promotion in psychology
Felix D. Schönbrodt, Anne Gärtner, Maximilian Frank, et al.
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 42

Showing 1-25 of 42 citing articles:

Towards responsible research assessment: How to reward research quality
Anne Gärtner, Daniel Leising, Felix D. Schönbrodt
PLoS Biology (2024) Vol. 22, Iss. 2, pp. e3002553-e3002553
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
Practicing responsible research assessment: Qualitative study of faculty hiring, promotion, and tenure assessments in the United States
Alexander Rushforth, Sarah de Rijcke
Research Evaluation (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Zur Lage der Psychologie
Markus Bühner
Psychologische Rundschau (2022) Vol. 74, Iss. 1, pp. 1-20
Closed Access | Times Cited: 15
Empfehlungen zur Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Leistungen bei Berufungsverfahren in der Psychologie
Anne Gärtner, Daniel Leising, Felix D. Schönbrodt
Psychologische Rundschau (2023) Vol. 74, Iss. 3, pp. 166-174
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Responsible Research Assessment Should Prioritize Theory Development and Testing Over Ticking Open Science Boxes
Hannah Dames, Philipp Musfeld, Vencislav Popov, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
An analysis of functional relationships between systemic conditions and unethical behavior in German academia
Ncole Bössel, Annette Kluge, Daniel Leising, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Why does preregistration increase the persuasiveness of evidence? A Bayesian rationalization
Aaron Peikert, Maximilian Stefan Ernst, Andreas M. Brandmaier
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Eleven Strategies for Making Reproducible Research and Open Science Training the Norm at Research Institutions
Friederike E. Kohrs, Susann Auer, Alexandra Bannach‐Brown, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Comment on "Responsible Research Assessment: Implementing DORA for hiring and promotion in psychology”
Victor Auger, Nele Claes
Meta-Psychology (2024) Vol. 8
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Research assessment using a narrow definition of “research quality” is an act of gatekeeping: A comment on Gärtner et al. (2022)
Tom Hostler
Meta-Psychology (2024) Vol. 8
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Practicing Responsible Research Assessment: Qualitative study of Faculty Hiring, Promotion, and Tenure Assessments in the United States
Alexander Rushforth, Sarah de Rijcke
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Responsible Research is also concerned with generalizability: Recognizing efforts to reflect upon and increase generalizability in hiring and promotion decisions in psychology
Roman Stengelin, Manuel Bohn, Alejandro Sánchez-Amaro, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Empfehlungen zur Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Leistungen bei Berufungsverfahren in der Psychologie
Anne Gärtner, Daniel Leising, Felix D. Schönbrodt
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Responsible Research Assessment requires structural more than procedural reforms.
Gidon T. Frischkorn
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Responsible Research Assessment
Felix D. Schönbrodt, Per Pippin Aspaas
Deleted Journal (2023), Iss. 52
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Open Science in German Sport Psychology
Kathrin Wunsch, Nils Henrik Pixa, Katharina Utesch
Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie (2023) Vol. 30, Iss. 4, pp. 156-166
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Commentary: “Responsible Research Assessment: Implementing DORA for hiring and promotion in psychology”
Alejandro Sandoval‐Lentisco
Meta-Psychology (2024) Vol. 8
Open Access
Responsible Research is also concerned with generalizability: Recognizing efforts to reflect upon and increase generalizability in hiring and promotion decisions in psychology
Roman Stengelin, Manuel Bohn, Alejandro Sánchez-Amaro, et al.
Meta-Psychology (2024) Vol. 8
Open Access
Responsible assessment of what research? Beware of epistemic diversity!
Sven Ulpts
Meta-Psychology (2024) Vol. 8
Open Access
Valuing Preprints Must be Part of Responsible Research Assessment
Moin Syed
Meta-Psychology (2024) Vol. 8
Open Access
Responsible Research Assessment requires structural more than procedural reforms
Gidon T. Frischkorn
Meta-Psychology (2024) Vol. 8
Open Access
Responsible research assessment in the area of quantitative methods research: A comment on Gärtner et al.
Holger Brandt, Mirka Henninger, Esther Ulitzsch, et al.
Meta-Psychology (2024) Vol. 8
Open Access
Responsible Research Assessment Should Prioritize Theory Development and Testing Over Ticking Open Science Boxes
Hannah Dames, Philipp Musfeld, Vencislav Popov, et al.
Meta-Psychology (2024) Vol. 8
Open Access
Interdisciplinary Value
Veli‐Matti Karhulahti
Meta-Psychology (2024) Vol. 8
Open Access
Response to responsible research assessment I and II from the perspective of the DGPs working group on open science in clinical psychology
Jakob Fink-Lamotte, Kevin Hilbert, Dorothée Bentz, et al.
Meta-Psychology (2024) Vol. 8
Open Access
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top