Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

The Blind Hens' Challenge: Does It Undermine the View That Only Welfare Matters in Our Dealings with Animals?
Peter Sandøe, P.M. Hocking, Björn Forkman, et al.
Environmental Values (2014) Vol. 23, Iss. 6, pp. 727-742
Open Access | Times Cited: 35

Showing 1-25 of 35 citing articles:

A consensus on the definition of positive animal welfare
Jean‐Loup Rault, Melissa Bateson, Alain Boissy, et al.
Biology Letters (2025) Vol. 21, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Positive selection rather than relaxation of functional constraint drives the evolution of vision during chicken domestication
Mingshan Wang, Rongwei Zhang, Ling-Yan Su, et al.
Cell Research (2016) Vol. 26, Iss. 5, pp. 556-573
Open Access | Times Cited: 65
If I Could Talk to the Animals: Measuring Subjective Animal Welfare
Heather Browning
(2019)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 40
“Naturalness” and Its Relation to Animal Welfare from an Ethological Perspective
Lorenz Gygax, Edna Hillmann
Agriculture (2018) Vol. 8, Iss. 9, pp. 136-136
Open Access | Times Cited: 37
Animal (De)liberation: Should the Consumption of Animal Products Be Banned?
Jan Deckers
(2016)
Open Access | Times Cited: 28
An Overview of Engineering Approaches to Improving Agricultural Animal Welfare
Candace Croney, William M. Muir, Ji‐Qin Ni, et al.
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (2018) Vol. 31, Iss. 2, pp. 143-159
Closed Access | Times Cited: 25
The Vanishing Ethics of Husbandry
Paul Β. Thompson
˜The œinternational library of environmental, agricultural and food ethics/˜The œInternational library of environmental, agricultural and food ethics (2021), pp. 203-221
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Gemeinsame Zukunft für Mensch und Tier
Leonie N. Bossert
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Gene Editing Cattle for Enhancing Heat Tolerance: A Welfare Review of the “PRLR-SLICK Cattle” Case
Mattia Pozzebon, Bernt Guldbrandtsen, Peter Sandøe
NanoEthics (2024) Vol. 18, Iss. 2
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Ethical and Animal Welfare Considerations in Relation to Species Selection for Animal Experimentation
John Webster
Animals (2014) Vol. 4, Iss. 4, pp. 729-741
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
The Dignity of Diminished Animals: Species Norms and Engineering to Improve Welfare
Marcus Schultz-Bergin
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (2017) Vol. 20, Iss. 4, pp. 843-856
Closed Access | Times Cited: 15
No Pain, No Gain? In Defence of Genetically Disenhancing (Most) Research Animals
Katrien Devolder, Matthias Eggel
Animals (2019) Vol. 9, Iss. 4, pp. 154-154
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Public attitudes toward the use of technology to create new types of animals and animal products
Erin Ryan, Daniel M. Weary
Animal Welfare (2023) Vol. 32
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Would the Elimination of the Capacity to Suffer Solve Ethical Dilemmas in Experimental Animal Research?
Adam Shriver
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences (2014), pp. 117-132
Closed Access | Times Cited: 5
The 3Rs principles and genetic pain disenhancement
Samuel Camenzind, Matthias Eggel
Animal Welfare (2022) Vol. 31, Iss. 4, pp. 495-503
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Technological Innovation and Animal Law: Does Dignity Do the Trick?
Anne Lansink
European Journal of Risk Regulation (2019) Vol. 10, Iss. 1, pp. 80-93
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Zoocentrism
Alison Hanlon, Manuel Magalhães‐Sant’Ana
Springer eBooks (2014), pp. 1-10
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
In Defense of Neural Disenhancement to Promote Animal Welfare
Bob Fischer
Advances in neuroethics (2020), pp. 135-150
Closed Access | Times Cited: 4
How Do Technologies Affect How We See and Treat Animals? Extending Technological Mediation Theory to Human-animal Relations
Koen Kramer, F.L.B. Meijboom
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (2022) Vol. 25, Iss. 4, pp. 595-611
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
How horses perceive their world—What can practitioners share with their clients to enhance safety and welfare?
Maria Vilain Rørvang, Camie R. Heleski
Elsevier eBooks (2024), pp. 119-145
Closed Access
Enhancing Animals is “Still Genetics”: Perspectives of Genome Scientists and Policymakers on Animal and Human Enhancement
Rebecca L. Walker, Zachary Ferguson, Lauren Mitchell, et al.
AJOB Empirical Bioethics (2024), pp. 1-9
Open Access
Palliative Farming
Ole Martin Moen, Katrien Devolder
The Journal of Ethics (2022) Vol. 26, Iss. 4, pp. 543-561
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Behavioural consequences of visual deprivation occurring at hatch or in the early life of chickens
P.M. Hocking, Kirsty-Anne Haldane, Emma Davidson, et al.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (2015) Vol. 172, pp. 33-43
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Ethical Intuitions, Welfare, and Permaculture
Isis Brook
Environmental Values (2014) Vol. 23, Iss. 6, pp. 637-639
Closed Access
Letter to the Editor
Manuel Magalhães‐Sant’Ana
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (2015) Vol. 42, Iss. 3, pp. 173-174
Open Access
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top