Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Emerging trends in peer review—a survey
Richard Walker, Pascal Rocha da Silva
Frontiers in Neuroscience (2015) Vol. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 173

Showing 1-25 of 173 citing articles:

Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review
Andrew Tomkins, Min Zhang, William D. Heavlin
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2017) Vol. 114, Iss. 48, pp. 12708-12713
Open Access | Times Cited: 525
What is open peer review? A systematic review
Tony Ross‐Hellauer
F1000Research (2017) Vol. 6, pp. 588-588
Open Access | Times Cited: 322
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Giangiacomo Bravo, Francisco Grimaldo, Emilia López-Iñesta, et al.
Nature Communications (2019) Vol. 10, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 246
What is open peer review? A systematic review
Tony Ross‐Hellauer
F1000Research (2017) Vol. 6, pp. 588-588
Open Access | Times Cited: 225
Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers
Tony Ross‐Hellauer, Arvid Deppe, Birgit Schmidt
PLoS ONE (2017) Vol. 12, Iss. 12, pp. e0189311-e0189311
Open Access | Times Cited: 219
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
Jonathan Tennant, Jonathan M. Dugan, Daniel Graziotin, et al.
F1000Research (2017) Vol. 6, pp. 1151-1151
Open Access | Times Cited: 207
The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise
Michail Kovanis, Raphaël Porcher, Philippe Ravaud, et al.
PLoS ONE (2016) Vol. 11, Iss. 11, pp. e0166387-e0166387
Open Access | Times Cited: 195
Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature
Clarissa F. D. Carneiro, Victor G. S. Queiroz, Thiago C. Moulin, et al.
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2020) Vol. 5, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 141
The value of joint peer review between early career researchers and supervisors
Viviana Macarelli, Florian T. Merkle
Trends in Cell Biology (2025)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Evolving and Sustaining Ocean Best Practices and Standards for the Next Decade
Jay Pearlman, Mark Bushnell, Laurent Coppola, et al.
Frontiers in Marine Science (2019) Vol. 6
Open Access | Times Cited: 146
The changing forms and expectations of peer review
Serge P. J. M. Horbach, W. Halffman
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2018) Vol. 3, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 140
The state of the art in peer review
Jonathan Tennant
FEMS Microbiology Letters (2018) Vol. 365, Iss. 19
Open Access | Times Cited: 131
Does health informatics have a replication crisis?
Enrico Coiera, Elske Ammenwerth, Andrew Georgiou, et al.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (2018) Vol. 25, Iss. 8, pp. 963-968
Open Access | Times Cited: 100
Deep learning in electron microscopy
Jeffrey M. Ede
Machine Learning Science and Technology (2020) Vol. 2, Iss. 1, pp. 011004-011004
Open Access | Times Cited: 84
Guidelines for open peer review implementation
Tony Ross‐Hellauer, Edit Görögh
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2019) Vol. 4, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 82
Bad Beliefs
Neil Levy
Oxford University Press eBooks (2021)
Open Access | Times Cited: 80
No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic
Serge P. J. M. Horbach
Research Evaluation (2020) Vol. 30, Iss. 3, pp. 231-239
Open Access | Times Cited: 72
Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication
Michail Kovanis, Ludovic Trinquart, Philippe Ravaud, et al.
Scientometrics (2017) Vol. 113, Iss. 1, pp. 651-671
Open Access | Times Cited: 65
Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals
Thomas Klebel, Stefan Reichmann, Jessica Polka, et al.
PLoS ONE (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 10, pp. e0239518-e0239518
Open Access | Times Cited: 65
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
Jonathan Tennant, Jonathan M. Dugan, Daniel Graziotin, et al.
F1000Research (2017) Vol. 6, pp. 1151-1151
Open Access | Times Cited: 64
Innovative Strategies for Peer Review
Edward Barroga
Journal of Korean Medical Science (2020) Vol. 35, Iss. 20
Open Access | Times Cited: 51
Consistency of covid-19 trial preprints with published reports and impact for decision making: retrospective review
Dena Zeraatkar, Tyler Pitre, Gareth Leung, et al.
BMJ Medicine (2022) Vol. 1, Iss. 1, pp. e000309-e000309
Open Access | Times Cited: 33
Mapping the landscape of internal auditing effectiveness study: a bibliometric approach
Sofik Handoyo
Cogent Business & Management (2024) Vol. 11, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Evolving paradigms in accounting education: A bibliometric study on the impact of information technology
Sofik Handoyo
The International Journal of Management Education (2024) Vol. 22, Iss. 3, pp. 100998-100998
Closed Access | Times Cited: 7
The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications
Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Willem Halffman
Scientometrics (2018) Vol. 118, Iss. 1, pp. 339-373
Open Access | Times Cited: 56
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top