Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports
Ivan Buljan, Daniel García-Costa, Francisco Grimaldo, et al.
eLife (2020) Vol. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 29

Showing 1-25 of 29 citing articles:

Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals
Flaminio Squazzoni, Giangiacomo Bravo, Francisco Grimaldo, et al.
PLoS ONE (2021) Vol. 16, Iss. 10, pp. e0257919-e0257919
Open Access | Times Cited: 192
No Tickets for Women in the COVID-19 Race? A Study on Manuscript Submissions and Reviews in 2347 Elsevier Journals during the Pandemic
Flaminio Squazzoni, Giangiacomo Bravo, Francisco Grimaldo, et al.
SSRN Electronic Journal (2020)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 79
Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews
Anna Severin, Michaela Strinzel, Matthias Egger, et al.
PLoS Biology (2023) Vol. 21, Iss. 8, pp. e3002238-e3002238
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals
Daniel García-Costa, Flaminio Squazzoni, Bahar Mehmani, et al.
PeerJ (2022) Vol. 10, pp. e13539-e13539
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
Textual features of peer review predict top-cited papers: An interpretable machine learning perspective
Zhuanlan Sun
Journal of Informetrics (2024) Vol. 18, Iss. 2, pp. 101501-101501
Closed Access | Times Cited: 4
Open Science at the Generative AI Turn: An Exploratory Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Kristi Holmes, et al.
(2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Understanding the peer review endeavor in scientific publishing
Guangyao Zhang, Shenmeng Xu, Yao Sun, et al.
Journal of Informetrics (2022) Vol. 16, Iss. 2, pp. 101264-101264
Closed Access | Times Cited: 17
<p>Study Protocol: Measuring the effect of COVID on the reviewing process</p>
Francisco Grimaldo, Daniel García-Costa, Flaminio Squazzoni, et al.
SSRN Electronic Journal (2025)
Closed Access
Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review
Amanda Sizo, Adriano Del Pino Lino, Álvaro Rocha, et al.
Knowledge and Information Systems (2025)
Open Access
Analyzing sentiments in peer review reports: Evidence from two science funding agencies
Junwen Luo, Thomas Feliciani, Martin Reinhart, et al.
Quantitative Science Studies (2021) Vol. 2, Iss. 4, pp. 1271-1295
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
A reviewer-reputation ranking algorithm to identify high-quality papers during the review process
Fujuan Gao, Enrico Maria Fenoaltea, Pan Zhang, et al.
Expert Systems with Applications (2024) Vol. 249, pp. 123551-123551
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
The academic status of reviewers predicts their language use
Zhuanlan Sun, C. Clark Cao, Chao Ma, et al.
Journal of Informetrics (2023) Vol. 17, Iss. 4, pp. 101449-101449
Closed Access | Times Cited: 7
Open Science at the Generative AI Turn: An Exploratory Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities
Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Kristi Holmes, et al.
Quantitative Science Studies (2024) Vol. 6, pp. 22-45
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
The impact of peer review on the contribution potential of scientific papers
Akira Matsui, Emily Chen, Yunwen Wang, et al.
PeerJ (2021) Vol. 9, pp. e11999-e11999
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
Does peer review improve the statistical content of manuscripts? A study on 27 467 submissions to four journals
Daniel García-Costa, Anabel Forte, Emilia López-Iñesta, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2022) Vol. 9, Iss. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Meta-research in pharmacy: Time for a look in the mirror
Spencer E. Harpe
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (2021) Vol. 17, Iss. 12, pp. 2028-2035
Closed Access | Times Cited: 11
Measuring the effect of reviewers on manuscript change: A study on a sample of submissions to Royal Society journals (2006–2017)
Federico Bianchi, Daniel García-Costa, Francisco Grimaldo, et al.
Journal of Informetrics (2022) Vol. 16, Iss. 3, pp. 101316-101316
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Do reviewers get their deserved acknowledgments from the authors of manuscripts?
Jia Pengfei, Weixi Xie, Guangyao Zhang, et al.
Scientometrics (2023) Vol. 128, Iss. 10, pp. 5687-5703
Closed Access | Times Cited: 4
What makes or breaks competitive research proposals? A mixed-methods analysis of research grant evaluation reports
Darko Hren, David G. Pina, Christopher Norman, et al.
Journal of Informetrics (2022) Vol. 16, Iss. 2, pp. 101289-101289
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
The association of gender, experience, and academic rank in peer-reviewed manuscript evaluation
J. A. García, J. J. Montero-Parodi, Rosa Rodríguez‐Sánchez, et al.
Accountability in Research (2024), pp. 1-25
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
“This article is interesting, however”: exploring the language use in the peer review comment of articles published in the BMJ
Guangyao Zhang, Licheng Wang, Weixi Xie, et al.
Aslib Journal of Information Management (2021) Vol. 74, Iss. 3, pp. 399-416
Closed Access | Times Cited: 9
The researchers using AI to analyse peer review
Richard Van Noorden
Nature (2022) Vol. 609, Iss. 7927, pp. 455-455
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Linguistic and semantic characteristics of articles and peer review reports in Social Sciences and Medical and Health Sciences: analysis of articles published in Open Research Central
Andrijana Perković Paloš, Antonija Mijatović, Ivan Buljan, et al.
Scientometrics (2023) Vol. 128, Iss. 8, pp. 4707-4729
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Making peer review evidence-based: It’s time to open the "black box"
Daniel J. Dunleavy
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Development and application of a comprehensive glossary for the identification of statistical and methodological concepts in peer review reports
Ivan Buljan, Daniel García-Costa, Francisco Grimaldo, et al.
Journal of Informetrics (2024) Vol. 18, Iss. 3, pp. 101555-101555
Closed Access
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top